* RE:Re: Re: Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
@ 2003-01-01 5:59 Hell.Surfers
2003-01-01 6:14 ` A Guy Called Tyketto
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hell.Surfers @ 2003-01-01 5:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tyketto, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 284 bytes --]
you are incorrect about how the GPL works you are attempting to anger me but I dont care, go and learn, finish school, then annoy me.
Dean. Three ways to kill yourself, and ive been drove in one...
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 21:51:45 -0800 A Guy Called Tyketto <tyketto@wizard.com> wrote:
[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 3475 bytes --]
From: A Guy Called Tyketto <tyketto@wizard.com>
To: Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 21:51:45 -0800
Message-ID: <20030101055145.GA8790@wizard.com>
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 05:30:18AM +0000, Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net wrote:
> They are stealing by changing GPL files, and not giving the source, its
And just how the smeg do you KNOW they're CHANGING these files, aye?
Do you have some super secret K-9 nose that the rest of us don't, and can
tell? Have you reverse engineered the binary to see? Please, enlighten us.
not for personal use so they are DISTRIBUTING it, and INCLUDING IT.
This does not make sense. You're saying they're changing GPL'd files,
though they can use them any way they choose, as long as they notify the
original author of the changes they made. Whether they redistribute the CODE,
is up to them. They chose not to. As long as they have notified those who
wrote the headers, no GPL violation has been made.
BUT they dont give out their DERIVED source.
Once again, there is no clause in the GPL that states they MUST give
out the code. All they need to do is notify the author. Also, They MUST give
out the code, if they've MODIFIED the headers. You'd be stewing and eating
your boots for dinner if NVidia released the code, and you found no headers to
be modified. their code, they can do anything they want. But for the headers,
all they'd need to do for changing their code, is to keep a current version of
the headers from the kernel, and program their C code to their content. Once
again, No. GPL. Violation.
I work with C everyday and when you put in a header file you are including it,
all kernel headers are GPL. I read the license 4 times a day and have
since 1995.
And we don't deal with C at all. The kernel is programmed in COBOL,
ADA, Modula-2, Mumps, and Pick. Hell, I just might port it part of it over to
Logo. Oh damn.. Apple will sue me for that.. Let's port it to C! I'll learn
it, with my trusty Visual C, and Borland C compilers! </sarcasm>
BL.
--
Brad Littlejohn | Email: tyketto@wizard.com
Unix Systems Administrator, | tyketto@ozemail.com.au
Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! :) | http://www.wizard.com/~tyketto
PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: Re: Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
2003-01-01 5:59 RE:Re: Re: Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? Hell.Surfers
@ 2003-01-01 6:14 ` A Guy Called Tyketto
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: A Guy Called Tyketto @ 2003-01-01 6:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hell.Surfers; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 05:59:12AM +0000, Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net wrote:
> you are incorrect about how the GPL works you are attempting to anger me
but I dont care, go and learn, finish school, then annoy me.
>
I am? I'm sorry. I did not mean to anger someone who is more
experienced and sagely than a mere fool such as myself. I suppose I'll throw
away my Bachelor's degree in Comp. Sci from '96, all the C programs I've coded
since 91, all the logo since '81, as well as the projects I'm currently
working on. I am such a fool. Back to programming Zaxxon on my Apple IIe for
me. Perhaps even Karateka.. or Spy Hunter.
BTW: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html . Bookmark it. And come
back when you have a better MUA. It's starting to remind me of WebTV.
BL.
P.S.
Kryten: There's something familiar about you, too.. I get a name...
Smee... Smeeg Heeeeeed!!
Rimmer: Smeghead?
Kryten: That's it!
Rimmer: He remembers me!!
--
Brad Littlejohn | Email: tyketto@wizard.com
Unix Systems Administrator, | tyketto@ozemail.com.au
Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! :) | http://www.wizard.com/~tyketto
PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-01 6:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-01 5:59 RE:Re: Re: Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? Hell.Surfers
2003-01-01 6:14 ` A Guy Called Tyketto
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®