From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, kprateek.nayak@amd.com,
iii@linux.ibm.com, tglx@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
pbonzini@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com, vschneid@redhat.com,
huschle@linux.ibm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, mgorman@suse.de, bsegall@google.com,
maddy@linux.ibm.com, srikar@linux.ibm.com, hdanton@sina.com,
chleroy@kernel.org, vineeth@bitbyteword.org, frederic@kernel.org,
arighi@nvidia.com, pauld@redhat.com, christian.loehle@arm.com,
tj@kernel.org, tommaso.cucinotta@gmail.com, maz@kernel.org,
rafael@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/20] cpumask: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 09:23:17 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f90bdcc-857f-4ffa-91a5-60965fae3d8f@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ajNKE1P9JGxDh0CD@yury>
Hi Yury.
>> +void set_cpu_preferred(unsigned int cpu, bool preferred)
>> +{
>> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + assign_cpu((cpu), &__cpu_preferred_mask, (preferred));
>> +}
>
> set_cpu_xxx() is a macro on purpose - it improves code generation
> quite a lot. See 5c563ee90a22d. Can you keep set_cpu_preferred aligned
> with the other set_cpu(), i.e. make it a macro?
>
Ok. only reason was to avoid ifdeffery there.
you mean below?
#ifdef CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU
#else
#endif
>> +
>> /*
>> * Activate the first processor.
>> */
>> @@ -3164,6 +3177,7 @@ void __init boot_cpu_init(void)
>> /* Mark the boot cpu "present", "online" etc for SMP and UP case */
>> set_cpu_online(cpu, true);
>> set_cpu_active(cpu, true);
>> + set_cpu_preferred(cpu, true);
>> set_cpu_present(cpu, true);
>> set_cpu_possible(cpu, true);
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> index 2f4530eb543f..9e16946c9d62 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> @@ -8685,6 +8685,9 @@ int sched_cpu_activate(unsigned int cpu)
>> */
>> sched_set_rq_online(rq, cpu);
>>
>> + /* preferred is subset of active and follows its state */
>> + set_cpu_preferred(cpu, true);
>
> Did you put it at the end of the function on purpose? If yes, please
> add a comment. If no, I'd prefer to have it immediately after
> set_cpu_active().
/*
* Put the rq online, if not already. This happens:
*
* 1) In the early boot process, because we build the real domains
* after all CPUs have been brought up.
* 2) At runtime, if cpuset_cpu_active() fails to rebuild the
* domains.
*/
sched_set_rq_online(rq, cpu);
This was the reason. I wanted active related functionality to complete.
>
>> +
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -8698,6 +8701,8 @@ int sched_cpu_deactivate(unsigned int cpu)
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> + set_cpu_preferred(cpu, false);
>> +
>> /*
>> * Remove CPU from nohz.idle_cpus_mask to prevent participating in
>> * load balancing when not active
>> --
>> 2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-18 3:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-17 17:41 [PATCH v4 00/20] sched: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask and steal-driven vCPU backoff Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 01/20] sched/debug: Remove unused schedstats Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 02/20] sched/docs: Document cpu_preferred_mask and Preferred CPU concept Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 03/20] kconfig: Provide PREFERRED_CPU option Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18 0:51 ` Yury Norov
2026-06-18 3:44 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 04/20] cpumask: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18 1:29 ` Yury Norov
2026-06-18 3:53 ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2026-06-18 8:27 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 05/20] sysfs: Add preferred CPU file Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 06/20] sched/core: allow only preferred CPUs in is_cpu_allowed Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18 3:32 ` Yury Norov
2026-06-18 4:17 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18 4:49 ` Yury Norov
2026-06-18 5:14 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18 3:49 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-18 4:22 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18 14:12 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 07/20] sched/fair: Select preferred CPU at wakeup when possible Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 08/20] sched/fair: load balance only among preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18 3:03 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-18 3:54 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 09/20] sched/core: Keep tick on non-preferred CPUs until tasks are out Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 10/20] sched/core: Push current task from non preferred CPU Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18 4:09 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-18 6:05 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 11/20] sched/debug: Add migration stats due to non preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 12/20] sched/debug: Create debugfs folder steal monitor Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 13/20] sched/debug: Provide debugfs to enable/disable " Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 14/20] sched/core: Introduce a simple " Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18 4:30 ` Yury Norov
2026-06-18 4:44 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18 5:32 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-18 6:01 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18 6:39 ` Yury Norov
2026-06-18 6:45 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18 7:16 ` Yury Norov
2026-06-19 6:26 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 15/20] sched/core: Compute steal values at regular intervals Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18 4:04 ` Yury Norov
2026-06-18 5:39 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 16/20] sched/core: Introduce default arch handling code for inc/dec preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18 4:15 ` Yury Norov
2026-06-18 4:42 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 17/20] sched/core: Handle steal values and mark CPUs as preferred Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 18/20] sched/core: Mark the direction of steal values to avoid oscillations Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 19/20] sched/debug: Add debug knobs for steal monitor Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 20/20] sched/core: Add a few check for valid CPU in inc/dec of preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18 4:21 ` Yury Norov
2026-06-18 4:40 ` Shrikanth Hegde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0f90bdcc-857f-4ffa-91a5-60965fae3d8f@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=huschle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tommaso.cucinotta@gmail.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vineeth@bitbyteword.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox