mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>, yury.norov@gmail.com
Cc: tglx@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	seanjc@google.com, vschneid@redhat.com, huschle@linux.ibm.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	bsegall@google.com, maddy@linux.ibm.com, srikar@linux.ibm.com,
	hdanton@sina.com, chleroy@kernel.org, vineeth@bitbyteword.org,
	frederic@kernel.org, arighi@nvidia.com, pauld@redhat.com,
	christian.loehle@arm.com, tj@kernel.org,
	tommaso.cucinotta@gmail.com, maz@kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, iii@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/20] sched/core: allow only preferred CPUs in is_cpu_allowed
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 19:42:08 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c469b983-d654-4669-9e4a-a15150d39b93@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2e21726e-e82f-45d2-a015-917695b49253@linux.ibm.com>

Hi Prateek, Yury,

On 6/18/26 9:52 AM, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
> Hi Prateek.
> 
> On 6/18/26 9:19 AM, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
>> Hello Shrikanth,
>>
>> On 6/17/2026 11:11 PM, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
>>> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
>>> @@ -1657,6 +1657,7 @@ struct task_struct {
>>>   #ifdef CONFIG_UNWIND_USER
>>>       struct unwind_task_info        unwind_info;
>>>   #endif
>>> +    int                has_preferred_cpu_state;
>>
>> Since this only really needs 2 bits, perhaps you can use the "u8 __pad"
>> in the task struct? ...
>>
>>>       /* CPU-specific state of this task: */
>>>       struct thread_struct        thread;
>>
>> [...snip...]
>>
>>> @@ -3549,6 +3568,14 @@ static int select_fallback_rq(int cpu, struct 
>>> task_struct *p)
>>>       enum { cpuset, possible, fail } state = cpuset;
>>>       int dest_cpu;
>>> +    /*
>>> +     * Cache value whether task's affinity spans preferred CPUs.
>>> +     * This helps to avoid repeating the same for each CPU
>>> +     * later in the loop. Encode call to is_cpu_allowed coming
>>> +     * via select_fallback_rq.
>>> +     */
>>> +    p->has_preferred_cpu_state = task_has_preferred_cpus(p) << 8 | 0x1;
>>
>> ... Or maybe it can be an s8 and this indicator can be a tri-state like:
>>
>>   -1:  Cached; preferred CPUs exists
>>    0:  preferred CPUs not cached
>>    1:  Cached; preferred CPUs don't exist
>>
> 
> Yes. Current encoding has.
> 
> 1. call came from select_fallback_rq and preferred CPUs exists
> 2. call came from select_fallback_rq and preferred CPUs doesn't exists
> 3. Call didn't come from select_fallback_rq and evaluate the 
> cpumask_interesect.
> 
>> and then the comparison can simply be:
>>
>>      if (cached)
>>          return cached < 0;
>>
>> ppc64le and arm64 seems to generates slightly smaller code for "< 0"
>> check compared to the current scheme of (& + >>) in
>> task_has_preferred_cpus().
>>
> 
> Yes, this seems better. I will give it a try.

I guess below captures the discussion on this patch.
Other way is pass it as local variable to is_cpu_allowed.

---

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index e435f3073ffc..8c2fe953f19b 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1658,7 +1658,7 @@ struct task_struct {
  #ifdef CONFIG_UNWIND_USER
         struct unwind_task_info         unwind_info;
  #endif
-       int                             has_preferred_cpu_state;
+       s8                              has_preferred_cpu_state;
  
         /* CPU-specific state of this task: */
         struct thread_struct            thread;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 9342aae315ca..26c82cd0bcec 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2504,7 +2504,7 @@ static inline bool rq_has_pinned_tasks(struct rq *rq)
   */
  static inline bool is_cpu_allowed(struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
  {
-       bool task_check_preferred_cpu = false;
+       bool task_check_preferred_cpu;
  
         /* When not in the task's cpumask, no point in looking further. */
         if (!task_allowed_on_cpu(p, cpu))
@@ -3573,12 +3573,12 @@ static int select_fallback_rq(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
         int dest_cpu;
  
         /*
-        * Cache value whether task's affinity spans preferred CPUs.
+        * Cache the value whether task's affinity spans preferred CPUs.
          * This helps to avoid repeating the same for each CPU
          * later in the loop. Encode call to is_cpu_allowed coming
          * via select_fallback_rq.
          */
-       p->has_preferred_cpu_state = task_has_preferred_cpus(p) << 8 | 0x1;
+       p->has_preferred_cpu_state = task_has_preferred_cpus(p) ? 1 : -1;
  
         /*
          * If the node that the CPU is on has been offlined, cpu_to_node()
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index f3814099cc0b..da8134568229 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -4220,20 +4220,20 @@ DEFINE_CLASS_IS_UNCONDITIONAL(sched_change)
  #include "ext.h"
  
  /*
- * has_preferred_cpu_state is encoding two bits of information.
- * First Byte is to encode where the call to is_cpu_allowed coming from.
- * Second Byte is to encode the intersection of task affinity
- * and cpu_preferred_mask.
+ * has_preferred_cpu_state could have the value cached from
+ * select_fallback_rq. It is set/cleared while holding pi_lock
+ * and irq disabled.
   *
- * If 1st Byte is set, call to is_cpu_allowed coming from select_fallback_rq.
- * That helps to avoid repeated calculation keeping time complexity same.
+ *  1: Cached and preferred CPUs exists in task's affinity.
+ *  0: Not cached and need to evaluate.
+ * -1: Cached and preferred CPU doesn't exits task's affinity
   */
  static inline bool task_has_preferred_cpus(struct task_struct *p)
  {
-       int cached_value = p->has_preferred_cpu_state;
+       int cached = p->has_preferred_cpu_state;
  
-       if (cached_value & 0x1)
-               return p->has_preferred_cpu_state >> 8;
+       if (cached)
+               return cached > 0;
         else
                 return cpumask_intersects(p->cpus_ptr, cpu_preferred_mask);
  }


  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-18 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-17 17:41 [PATCH v4 00/20] sched: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask and steal-driven vCPU backoff Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 01/20] sched/debug: Remove unused schedstats Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 02/20] sched/docs: Document cpu_preferred_mask and Preferred CPU concept Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 03/20] kconfig: Provide PREFERRED_CPU option Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18  0:51   ` Yury Norov
2026-06-18  3:44     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 04/20] cpumask: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18  1:29   ` Yury Norov
2026-06-18  3:53     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18  8:27       ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 05/20] sysfs: Add preferred CPU file Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 06/20] sched/core: allow only preferred CPUs in is_cpu_allowed Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18  3:32   ` Yury Norov
2026-06-18  4:17     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18  4:49       ` Yury Norov
2026-06-18  5:14         ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18  3:49   ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-18  4:22     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18 14:12       ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 07/20] sched/fair: Select preferred CPU at wakeup when possible Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 08/20] sched/fair: load balance only among preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18  3:03   ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-18  3:54     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 09/20] sched/core: Keep tick on non-preferred CPUs until tasks are out Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 10/20] sched/core: Push current task from non preferred CPU Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18  4:09   ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-18  6:05     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 11/20] sched/debug: Add migration stats due to non preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 12/20] sched/debug: Create debugfs folder steal monitor Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 13/20] sched/debug: Provide debugfs to enable/disable " Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 14/20] sched/core: Introduce a simple " Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18  4:30   ` Yury Norov
2026-06-18  4:44     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18  5:32       ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-18  6:01         ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18  6:39           ` Yury Norov
2026-06-18  6:45             ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18  7:16               ` Yury Norov
2026-06-19  6:26                 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 15/20] sched/core: Compute steal values at regular intervals Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18  4:04   ` Yury Norov
2026-06-18  5:39     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 16/20] sched/core: Introduce default arch handling code for inc/dec preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18  4:15   ` Yury Norov
2026-06-18  4:42     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 17/20] sched/core: Handle steal values and mark CPUs as preferred Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 18/20] sched/core: Mark the direction of steal values to avoid oscillations Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 19/20] sched/debug: Add debug knobs for steal monitor Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 20/20] sched/core: Add a few check for valid CPU in inc/dec of preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18  4:21   ` Yury Norov
2026-06-18  4:40     ` Shrikanth Hegde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c469b983-d654-4669-9e4a-a15150d39b93@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=huschle@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=pauld@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=tommaso.cucinotta@gmail.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vineeth@bitbyteword.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox