From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Dan Hollis <goemon@anime.net>
Cc: David Lang <dlang@diginsite.com>,
Timur Tabi <ttabi@interactivesi.com>,
Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Dual Athlon XP 1800+ on Tyan Thunder K7 or Tiger MP anyone?
Date: 09 Oct 2001 18:43:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1002667385.1673.129.camel@phantasy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0110091528450.18826-100000@anime.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0110091528450.18826-100000@anime.net>
On Tue, 2001-10-09 at 18:30, Dan Hollis wrote:
> It's palomino core. It means, new SSE instructions, bigger TLB cache,
> prefetch, and 20% power reduction. All this for maybe 5%-15% performance
> increase. And a not so nice increase in price tag :-o
Oh, you are right.
I meant MP vs XP part, sorry. From what I gather, MP is no different
from XP, although perhaps "certified for SMP" -- despite costing more
per MHz.
> Dual 1.2 non-MP is fine for me thanks... plenty fast and cheap.
Completely Agreed. I am thinking of getting a dual AMD system for doing
more kernel work (tackle AMD and SMP). My main machine is a P3 now.
Robert Love
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-09 22:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-09 21:16 Dieter Nützel
2001-10-09 21:52 ` Timur Tabi
2001-10-09 22:06 ` Dan Hollis
2001-10-16 1:46 ` Dr. Kelsey Hudson
2001-10-16 2:22 ` Dan Hollis
2001-10-09 22:12 ` Robert Love
2001-10-09 20:58 ` David Lang
2001-10-09 22:30 ` Dan Hollis
2001-10-09 22:43 ` Robert Love [this message]
2001-10-11 19:14 ` bill davidsen
2001-10-11 19:22 ` nick
2001-10-15 21:30 ` Bill Davidsen
2001-10-15 21:58 ` Dan Hollis
2001-10-11 19:24 ` Jeffrey W. Baker
2001-10-15 21:37 ` Bill Davidsen
2001-10-15 21:57 ` Joel Jaeggli
2001-10-15 22:07 ` Timur Tabi
2001-10-16 18:40 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2001-10-15 22:08 ` John Jasen
2001-10-15 22:20 ` Wilson
2001-10-16 12:23 ` Bill Davidsen
2001-10-11 21:19 ` John J Tobin
2001-10-12 19:32 ` Joel Jaeggli
2001-10-12 19:46 ` Jeff Nguyen
2001-10-12 20:32 ` Jelle Foks
2001-10-09 22:17 ` Charles Cazabon
2001-10-09 22:24 ` Dan Hollis
2001-10-09 21:09 ` David Lang
2001-10-09 22:32 ` Dan Hollis
2001-10-09 22:27 ` German Gomez Garcia
2001-10-09 22:54 ` Robert Love
2001-10-10 14:45 ` Charles Cazabon
2001-10-09 22:41 Dieter Nützel
2001-10-09 23:14 Dieter Nützel
2001-10-17 19:38 Thomas Esser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1002667385.1673.129.camel@phantasy \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=dlang@diginsite.com \
--cc=goemon@anime.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ttabi@interactivesi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®