From: "Dieter Nützel" <Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>
To: Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Subject: Re: Dual Athlon XP 1800+ on Tyan Thunder K7 or Tiger MP anyone?
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 01:14:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011009231350Z277261-760+22974@vger.kernel.org> (raw)
Am Mittwoch, 9. Oktober 2001 22:54 schrieb Robert Love:
> On Tue, 2001-10-09 at 18:17, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> > They work, but not "fine". There are performance issues with
> > Thunderbird-core Athlons in SMP configurations that may slow them down
> > somewhat.
>
> Are you sure it is related to SMP and not the fact the Palomino core is
> faster in general?
Yes and No. ;-)
Robert have a look at the direct comparisons of dual 1.2 GHz Athlon TB and
1.2 GHz Athlon MP. There are many flowting around. The Palomino core
enhancements are even at the same chip clock very good for SMP.
http://www.anandtech.com/chipsets/showdoc.html?i=1483&p=1
> I'm not saying non-Palomino-core Athlons don't have SMP issues.
They don't have issues but they are (much) slower in dual configurations for
specific test cases.
> I'm sure something is different -- a lot of errata is fixed (and added) in
> between core revisions. I'm just not so sure a measurable difference is
> easily shown...especially when there are other reasons for a performance
> increase in the core itself.
The differences _are_ easily shown.
So the Athlon XP (Palomino core) _IS_ the way to go...8-)
Regards,
Dieter
next reply other threads:[~2001-10-09 23:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-09 23:14 Dieter Nützel [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-17 19:38 Thomas Esser
2001-10-09 22:41 Dieter Nützel
2001-10-09 21:16 Dieter Nützel
2001-10-09 21:52 ` Timur Tabi
2001-10-09 22:06 ` Dan Hollis
2001-10-16 1:46 ` Dr. Kelsey Hudson
2001-10-16 2:22 ` Dan Hollis
2001-10-09 22:12 ` Robert Love
2001-10-09 20:58 ` David Lang
2001-10-09 22:30 ` Dan Hollis
2001-10-09 22:43 ` Robert Love
2001-10-11 19:14 ` bill davidsen
2001-10-11 19:22 ` nick
2001-10-15 21:30 ` Bill Davidsen
2001-10-15 21:58 ` Dan Hollis
2001-10-11 19:24 ` Jeffrey W. Baker
2001-10-15 21:37 ` Bill Davidsen
2001-10-15 21:57 ` Joel Jaeggli
2001-10-15 22:07 ` Timur Tabi
2001-10-16 18:40 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2001-10-15 22:08 ` John Jasen
2001-10-15 22:20 ` Wilson
2001-10-16 12:23 ` Bill Davidsen
2001-10-11 21:19 ` John J Tobin
2001-10-12 19:32 ` Joel Jaeggli
2001-10-12 19:46 ` Jeff Nguyen
2001-10-12 20:32 ` Jelle Foks
2001-10-09 22:17 ` Charles Cazabon
2001-10-09 22:24 ` Dan Hollis
2001-10-09 21:09 ` David Lang
2001-10-09 22:32 ` Dan Hollis
2001-10-09 22:27 ` German Gomez Garcia
2001-10-09 22:54 ` Robert Love
2001-10-10 14:45 ` Charles Cazabon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011009231350Z277261-760+22974@vger.kernel.org \
--to=dieter.nuetzel@hamburg.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®