From: Patrick Lynch <plynch@sphere.org>
To: "Rose, Billy" <wrose@loislaw.com>
Cc: "'root@chaos.analogic.com'" <root@chaos.analogic.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>,
Andreas Ferber <aferber@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: ext3 and undeletion
Date: 07 Mar 2002 16:30:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1015536627.23070.24.camel@plynch.noc.tmpw.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4188788C3E1BD411AA60009027E92DFD06307869@loisexc2.loislaw.com>
In-Reply-To: <4188788C3E1BD411AA60009027E92DFD06307869@loisexc2.loislaw.com>
I'm taking an idea from the NetApp filer and using LVM to solve these
issues. I'm hoping it will work as planned and not lose too much
performance. I am going to create snapshots of certain partitions with
LVM at different time indexes. I will use these snapshots to recover
lost data and to backup to tape.
On Tue, 2002-03-05 at 18:04, Rose, Billy wrote:
> To me, Linux is about freedom. As we all know, freedom comes with a price.
> My company has users that sit on Win9x boxes and use Explorer to connect to
> a set of Netware boxes. These boxes house critical data. I didn't create
> this system, it grew to what it is before my time. If it were up to me, all
> of the users would be running Emacs or some other great editor (vim is my
> favorite), and connect to a Linux machine via CVS with a Linux box to alter
> files so there is little chance they could crap out the file system, or
> delete files without knowing it. Explorer is one of those M$ monsters that,
> under the right circumstances, grabs an entire tree and grinds it up into
> the digital void. The users in question are at these moments little more
> than automatons from editing hundreds, perhaps even a thousand, files in
> some 8 hour span of time. These users don't even have the DOS prompt in
> their Start menu, let alone the time to mess with it. Bottom line: Linux is
> not being used for file servers in my company because this feature is not
> present. We are _not_ talking about a windblows trashcan here, we are
> talking about short term enterprise class file recovery as implemented in
> Netware. This was my intention when I brought the whole issue up on this
> list. We don't need a windows garbage can (unless you mean literally :), we
> need file recovery at the sysadmin level without going to the tapes as
> often. In order for Linux to take over the planet (my dream), then all of
> the features that keep companies tied to an OS needs to be addressed. This
> issue is one such company tie.
>
> Billy Rose
>
> P.S. I got 2981.88 BogoMIPS today from a new install of RedHat 7.2 on a P4
> 1.5Ghz!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard B. Johnson [mailto:root@chaos.analogic.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 4:07 PM
> To: Pavel Machek
> Cc: Andreas Ferber; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: ext3 and undeletion
>
>
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > Hi
> > > > All the deleted files, with the correct path(s), are now in the
> > > > top directory file the file-system ../lost+found directory. They
> > > > are still owned by the original user, still subject to the same
> > > > quota.
> > >
> > > And what about:
> > >
> > > - Luser rm's "foo.c"
> > > - Luser starts working on new version of "foo.c"
> > > - Luser recognizes, that the old version was better
> > > - Luser rm's new "foo.c"
> > > - Luser tries to unrm the old "foo.c" -> *bang*
> > >
> > > Trust me, there /will/ be a luser who tries to do it this way. If
> > > teaching lusers were enough, you'd have no need for an unrm at all.
> >
> > You don't consider me a luser, right?
>
> Nope.
>
> Some newbees think that Windoze 'send-to-the-wastebasket' is a kernel-
> level "safe-delete". It's just some ^&$)##*@*) program that slows most
> of us down.
>
> Even Windows/Professional/2000 (NT) developers knew that it was
> garbage. If you've figured out how to get to the CMD prompt, just
> type:
>
> cd \
> rm -r *.*
> | | |______ They still have dots
> | |__________ Yes, even "folders" <coff, coff>
> |_____________ What do you expect for a stolen OS? Yes, `rm` instead of
> del, following the Unix pathname tradition.
>
> Cheers,
> Dick Johnson
>
> Penguin : Linux version 2.4.18 on an i686 machine (799.53 BogoMips).
>
> Bill Gates? Who?
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
plynch@sphere.org
"Communications without intelligence is noise;
Intelligence without communications is irrelevant."
- Gen Alfred. M. Gray, USMC .
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-07 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-05 23:04 Rose, Billy
2002-03-06 20:03 ` Mark Mielke
2002-03-07 21:30 ` Patrick Lynch [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-28 10:37 Randal, Phil
2002-02-26 18:39 Dana Lacoste
2002-02-26 18:47 ` Daniel Gryniewicz
2002-02-26 18:51 ` David Lang
2002-02-26 17:48 Rose, Billy
2002-02-26 17:53 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-26 18:03 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-02-26 17:56 ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-26 19:41 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-26 18:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-26 18:15 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-26 18:23 ` Jakob Østergaard
2002-02-26 18:19 ` David Lang
2002-02-26 18:29 ` Andreas Ferber
2002-02-27 21:00 ` James D Strandboge
2002-02-27 21:40 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-27 22:16 ` James D Strandboge
2002-02-27 22:33 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-27 23:03 ` James D Strandboge
2002-02-28 0:29 ` James D Strandboge
2002-03-04 2:17 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-03-04 15:12 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-04 15:33 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-03-04 19:17 ` James D Strandboge
2002-03-04 20:08 ` Jesse Pollard
2002-03-02 17:36 ` Pablo Alcaraz
[not found] <fa.n4lfl6v.h4chor@ifi.uio.no>
2002-02-25 17:06 ` Dan Maas
2002-02-25 17:20 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-02-25 23:33 ` Tom Rauschenbach
2002-02-26 0:27 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2002-02-26 5:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-26 16:05 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-02-26 16:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-26 16:40 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-02-26 16:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-26 17:12 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-02-26 16:36 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-26 16:43 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-02-26 16:54 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-26 17:05 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-02-26 17:07 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-26 17:16 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-02-26 17:22 ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-26 17:38 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-02-26 18:14 ` Andreas Ferber
2002-02-26 18:55 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-26 22:04 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-02-26 18:34 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-02-26 18:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-26 18:47 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-02-26 18:52 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-28 15:05 ` Andreas Ferber
2002-02-28 22:37 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-03-01 4:44 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-03-04 16:26 ` Pavel Machek
2002-03-05 21:29 ` Andreas Ferber
2002-03-06 11:30 ` Pavel Machek
2002-03-05 22:07 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-02-28 22:55 ` James D Strandboge
2002-02-26 17:22 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-03-01 0:19 ` Rick Lindsley
2002-03-01 1:02 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-26 17:54 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-26 18:24 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-04 15:40 ` Pavel Machek
2002-02-25 18:08 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-02-25 18:40 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-02-25 19:49 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-25 16:46 Rose, Billy
2002-02-25 3:27 Steven Walter
2002-02-25 5:08 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-25 10:16 ` Fabrice Bellet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1015536627.23070.24.camel@plynch.noc.tmpw.net \
--to=plynch@sphere.org \
--cc=aferber@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=root@chaos.analogic.com \
--cc=wrose@loislaw.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®