From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: "Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [tip: sched/core] sched/topology: Compute sd_weight considering cpuset partitions
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2026 15:15:57 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10204982-a007-4f44-ab12-bcddfe4140c8@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7fad91ea-e6cd-43c8-abe3-16d7843247ed@amd.com>
Hello folks,
On 3/21/2026 2:29 PM, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> So I managed to reproduce the crash and it is actually crashing at:
>
> last->next = first;
>
> in build_sched_groups(). If I print the span befora nd after we do
> the *sd = { ... }, I see:
>
> [ 0.056301] span before: 0
> [ 0.056559] span after:
> [ 0.056686] span double check:
>
> double check does a cpumask_pr_args(sched_domain_span(sd)).
> This solves the crash on top of this patch:
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> index 79bab80af8f2..b347ae5d2786 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> @@ -1693,6 +1693,8 @@ sd_init(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl,
> .name = tl->name,
> };
>
> + cpumask_and(sd_span, cpu_map, tl->mask(tl, cpu));
> +
> WARN_ONCE((sd->flags & (SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY | SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY)) ==
> (SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY | SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY),
> "CPU capacity asymmetry not supported on SMT\n");
> ---
>
> And I see:
>
> [ 0.056479] span before: 0
> [ 0.056749] span after: 0
> [ 0.056881] span double check: 0
>
>
> But since span[] is a variable array at the end of sched_domain struct,
> doing a *sd = { ... } shouldn't modify it since the size isn't known at
> compile time and the compiler will only overwrite the fixed fields.
>
> Is there a compiler angle I'm missing here?
So this is what I've found: By default we have:
cpumask_size: 4
struct sched_domain size: 296
If I do:
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/topology.h b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
index a1e1032426dc..f0bebce274f7 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/topology.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ struct sched_domain {
* by attaching extra space to the end of the structure,
* depending on how many CPUs the kernel has booted up with)
*/
- unsigned long span[];
+ unsigned long span[1];
};
static inline struct cpumask *sched_domain_span(struct sched_domain *sd)
---
I still see:
cpumask_size: 4
struct sched_domain size: 296
Which means we are overwriting the sd->span during *sd assignment even
with the variable length array at the end :-(
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-21 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-12 4:44 [PATCH v4 0/9] sched/topology: Optimize sd->shared allocation K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12 4:44 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] sched/topology: Compute sd_weight considering cpuset partitions K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12 9:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-12 9:59 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12 10:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-12 10:09 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-18 8:08 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-20 23:58 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-03-21 3:36 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-21 7:33 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-03-21 7:47 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-03-21 8:59 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-21 9:45 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2026-03-21 10:13 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-21 12:48 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-03-24 2:54 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-21 14:13 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-03-21 15:14 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-21 16:38 ` [PATCH] sched/topology: Initialize sd_span after assignment to *sd K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-23 9:08 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-03-23 17:34 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-23 9:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-23 13:24 ` Jon Hunter
2026-03-23 15:36 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-03-23 17:24 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-23 22:41 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-03-24 9:10 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/topology: Fix sched_domain_span() tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-12 4:44 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] sched/topology: Extract "imb_numa_nr" calculation into a separate helper K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12 13:37 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-12 15:42 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12 16:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-16 0:18 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-03-16 3:41 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-16 8:24 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-03-16 8:50 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-18 8:08 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12 4:44 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] sched/topology: Allocate per-CPU sched_domain_shared in s_data K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-18 8:08 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12 4:44 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] sched/topology: Switch to assigning "sd->shared" from s_data K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-18 8:08 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12 4:44 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] sched/topology: Remove sched_domain_shared allocation with sd_data K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-18 8:08 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12 4:44 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] sched/core: Check for rcu_read_lock_any_held() in idle_get_state() K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12 9:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-12 10:06 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-18 8:08 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12 4:44 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] sched/fair: Remove superfluous rcu_read_lock() in the wakeup path K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-15 23:36 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-03-16 3:19 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-18 8:08 ` [tip: sched/core] PM: EM: Switch to rcu_dereference_all() in " tip-bot2 for Dietmar Eggemann
2026-03-18 8:08 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Remove superfluous rcu_read_lock() in the " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12 4:44 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] sched/fair: Simplify the entry condition for update_idle_cpu_scan() K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-18 8:08 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12 4:44 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] sched/fair: Simplify SIS_UTIL handling in select_idle_cpu() K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-18 8:08 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-16 0:22 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] sched/topology: Optimize sd->shared allocation Dietmar Eggemann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=10204982-a007-4f44-ab12-bcddfe4140c8@amd.com \
--to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome