From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Li Chen <chenl311@chinatelecom.cn>,
"Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] sched/topology: Extract "imb_numa_nr" calculation into a separate helper
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 09:24:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d15bf1c4-0c74-43fc-b50e-aeb3836ca44b@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fee3a1da-689f-4f8a-aafb-ac958a5a11d7@amd.com>
Hi Prateek,
On 16.03.26 04:41, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> Hello Dietmar,
>
> On 3/16/2026 5:48 AM, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
[...]
> Indeed! "imb_numa_nr" only makes sense when looking at NUMA domains
> and having it assigned to 1 for lower domains is harmless
> (but wasteful indeed). I'm 99% sure we can simply do:
>
> (Only build tested)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> index 43150591914b..e9068a809dbc 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> @@ -2623,9 +2623,6 @@ static void adjust_numa_imbalance(struct sched_domain *sd_llc)
> else
> imb = nr_llcs;
>
> - imb = max(1U, imb);
> - sd_llc->parent->imb_numa_nr = imb;
> -
> /*
> * Set span based on the first NUMA domain.
> *
> @@ -2639,10 +2636,14 @@ static void adjust_numa_imbalance(struct sched_domain *sd_llc)
> while (parent && !(parent->flags & SD_NUMA))
> parent = parent->parent;
>
> - imb_span = parent ? parent->span_weight : sd_llc->parent->span_weight;
> + /* No NUMA domain to adjust imbalance for! */
> + if (!parent)
> + return;
> +
> + imb = max(1U, imb);
> + imb_span = parent->span_weight;
>
> /* Update the upper remainder of the topology */
> - parent = sd_llc->parent;
> while (parent) {
> int factor = max(1U, (parent->span_weight / imb_span));
>
> ---
>
> If we have NUMA domains, we definitely have NODE and NODE sets neither
> SD_SHARE_LLC, nor SD_NUMA so likely sd->parent is PKG / NODE domain and
> NUMA has to start at sd->parent->parent and it has to break at the first
> SD_NUMA domains.
>
> If it doesn't exist, we don't have any NUMA domains and nothing to worry
> about, and if we do, the final loop will adjust the NUMA imbalance.
>
> Thoughts? Again, this commit was kept 1:1 with the previous loop but we
> can always improve :-)
Ah, I see!
This would work, IMHO.
Tested on qemu-system-aarch64 w/
-smp 8,sockets=2,clusters=2,cores=2,threads=1
Are you aware of a setup in which PKG would survive between MC and
lowest NUMA?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-16 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-12 4:44 [PATCH v4 0/9] sched/topology: Optimize sd->shared allocation K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12 4:44 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] sched/topology: Compute sd_weight considering cpuset partitions K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12 9:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-12 9:59 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12 10:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-12 10:09 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-18 8:08 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-20 23:58 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-03-21 3:36 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-21 7:33 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-03-21 7:47 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-03-21 8:59 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-21 9:45 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-21 10:13 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-21 12:48 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-03-24 2:54 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-21 14:13 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-03-21 15:14 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-21 16:38 ` [PATCH] sched/topology: Initialize sd_span after assignment to *sd K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-23 9:08 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-03-23 17:34 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-23 9:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-23 13:24 ` Jon Hunter
2026-03-23 15:36 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-03-23 17:24 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-23 22:41 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-03-24 9:10 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/topology: Fix sched_domain_span() tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-12 4:44 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] sched/topology: Extract "imb_numa_nr" calculation into a separate helper K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12 13:37 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-12 15:42 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12 16:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-16 0:18 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-03-16 3:41 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-16 8:24 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2026-03-16 8:50 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-18 8:08 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12 4:44 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] sched/topology: Allocate per-CPU sched_domain_shared in s_data K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-18 8:08 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12 4:44 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] sched/topology: Switch to assigning "sd->shared" from s_data K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-18 8:08 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12 4:44 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] sched/topology: Remove sched_domain_shared allocation with sd_data K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-18 8:08 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12 4:44 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] sched/core: Check for rcu_read_lock_any_held() in idle_get_state() K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12 9:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-12 10:06 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-18 8:08 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12 4:44 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] sched/fair: Remove superfluous rcu_read_lock() in the wakeup path K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-15 23:36 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-03-16 3:19 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-18 8:08 ` [tip: sched/core] PM: EM: Switch to rcu_dereference_all() in " tip-bot2 for Dietmar Eggemann
2026-03-18 8:08 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Remove superfluous rcu_read_lock() in the " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12 4:44 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] sched/fair: Simplify the entry condition for update_idle_cpu_scan() K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-18 8:08 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12 4:44 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] sched/fair: Simplify SIS_UTIL handling in select_idle_cpu() K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-18 8:08 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-16 0:22 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] sched/topology: Optimize sd->shared allocation Dietmar Eggemann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d15bf1c4-0c74-43fc-b50e-aeb3836ca44b@arm.com \
--to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=chenl311@chinatelecom.cn \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome