mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Kumlien <pomac@vapor.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Module removal [newbie thoughts]
Date: 08 Jul 2002 17:27:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1026142032.2058.24.camel@big.pomac.com> (raw)

Hi,(CC me)

As a newbie i'm kinda expecting flames here... but, I just had to share
my thoughts =/


Couldn't the kernel module subsystem work something like this:

When a module is loaded it gets it's own mutex (for shared locks).

Each program/module/kernel part that uses it obtains a lock.
If we load a new module that replaces a older module we could have lock
migrations to the new module.

This would make sure that all use of the module has ceased before it's
removed.

This would also require a "usage count" per module/kernel/program
though. But that could be included in the module subsystem imho or am i
wrong?

If a module is replaced by a newer/other module how do we manage the
transgression to the new module? Well depending on how the sub system
works it could be done automagically i think...

One problem with this is that it'll use more memory... 
And i bet that there are better less complicated ways of doing this but
i really think that the modules should be removable, it might take a
hour or so (worst case senario) but it should be removed eventually... 

//Ian Kumlien

PS. This is more or less a brainfart... so there might be huge holes in
the idea etc. And don't forget to CC me since i'm not on the list.
DS.



                 reply	other threads:[~2002-07-08 15:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1026142032.2058.24.camel@big.pomac.com \
    --to=pomac@vapor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®