mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Module removal [newbie thoughts]
@ 2002-07-08 15:27 Ian Kumlien
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Ian Kumlien @ 2002-07-08 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

Hi,(CC me)

As a newbie i'm kinda expecting flames here... but, I just had to share
my thoughts =/


Couldn't the kernel module subsystem work something like this:

When a module is loaded it gets it's own mutex (for shared locks).

Each program/module/kernel part that uses it obtains a lock.
If we load a new module that replaces a older module we could have lock
migrations to the new module.

This would make sure that all use of the module has ceased before it's
removed.

This would also require a "usage count" per module/kernel/program
though. But that could be included in the module subsystem imho or am i
wrong?

If a module is replaced by a newer/other module how do we manage the
transgression to the new module? Well depending on how the sub system
works it could be done automagically i think...

One problem with this is that it'll use more memory... 
And i bet that there are better less complicated ways of doing this but
i really think that the modules should be removable, it might take a
hour or so (worst case senario) but it should be removed eventually... 

//Ian Kumlien

PS. This is more or less a brainfart... so there might be huge holes in
the idea etc. And don't forget to CC me since i'm not on the list.
DS.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-07-08 15:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-07-08 15:27 Module removal [newbie thoughts] Ian Kumlien

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®