mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* 2.4.19-rc1 sending SIGALRM to exec'd process
@ 2002-07-09 16:33 Paul Larson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Paul Larson @ 2002-07-09 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marcelo Tosati; +Cc: lkml

2.4.19-rc1 seems to be having trouble sending a SIGALRM process that
have been exec'd on one of my test boxes.  From the Linux Test Project,
alarm04 test:

sig_rev     1  FAIL  :  alarm() fails to send SIGALRM to execed
                                  process

Also, the gettimeofday02 test fails when execed from the test driver,
but not when you run it alone.  This test also sends a SIGALRM to know
when it's done.

Machine is a PIII-600

Thanks,
Paul Larson


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.4.19-rc1 sending SIGALRM to exec'd process
       [not found] <1026250476.32159.11.camel@plars.austin.ibm.com>
@ 2002-07-11 21:31 ` Marcelo Tosatti
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Marcelo Tosatti @ 2002-07-11 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Larson; +Cc: lkml



On 9 Jul 2002, Paul Larson wrote:

> On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 11:33, Paul Larson wrote:
> > 2.4.19-rc1 seems to be having trouble sending a SIGALRM process that
> > have been exec'd on one of my test boxes.  From the Linux Test Project,
> > alarm04 test:
> >
> > sig_rev     1  FAIL  :  alarm() fails to send SIGALRM to execed
> >                                   process
> >
> > Also, the gettimeofday02 test fails when execed from the test driver,
> > but not when you run it alone.  This test also sends a SIGALRM to know
> > when it's done.
> Nevermind, I think this can safely be ignored.  I can reliably reproduce
> it on this one machine, but not on anything else and I suspect that
> there may be a preexisting condition with the machine that is having
> problems.  I borrowed it in a pinch to get the testing done while I was
> rebuilding my regular test box.  My regular test box is rebuilt now, so
> I'll rerun on that one.

Ho hum, OK.

One more thing: Does 2.4.18 fails the test on _that_ box ?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-07-11 22:23 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-07-09 16:33 2.4.19-rc1 sending SIGALRM to exec'd process Paul Larson
     [not found] <1026250476.32159.11.camel@plars.austin.ibm.com>
2002-07-11 21:31 ` Marcelo Tosatti

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®