From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Thunder from the hill <thunder@lightweight.ods.org>
Cc: Bernd Eckenfels <ecki-news2002-08@lina.inka.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.4 and full ipv6 - will it happen?
Date: 22 Aug 2002 19:22:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1030040562.3090.47.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208220009110.3234-100000@hawkeye.luckynet.adm>
On Thu, 2002-08-22 at 07:12, Thunder from the hill wrote:
> Well, it's not too easy any more to say "I am the Alan Cox client. Send me
> naked children." If you were ever hit by that or similar, you'd certainly
> think differently, once you've seen that these "tools" for IPv4 are
Its trivial. IPv4 or IPv6 it takes a couple of minutes of fiddling from
a suitably connected point. I wouldnt actually bother with that anyway,
the people who maintain web cache logs are normally paid so little that
$1000 for running a provided script really would be less hassle for your
budding organised criminal or government agent.
There is no difference in the security between IPv4 and IPv6. None at
all.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-22 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-19 4:39 Tomasz Torcz, BG
2002-08-19 4:37 ` David S. Miller
2002-08-19 5:16 ` Tomasz Torcz, BG
2002-08-19 5:12 ` David S. Miller
2002-08-19 23:34 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-08-19 23:23 ` David S. Miller
2002-08-19 23:49 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-08-19 23:54 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-20 0:32 ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-20 13:54 ` kuznet
2002-08-20 6:56 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-08-21 20:24 ` Kelsey Hudson
2002-08-21 21:31 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2002-08-21 21:44 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-08-21 22:03 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2002-08-21 23:13 ` Russell King
2002-08-22 0:05 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2002-08-22 6:08 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-08-26 18:55 ` Kelsey Hudson
2002-08-26 19:44 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2002-08-26 21:51 ` Michael H. Warfield
2002-08-26 23:48 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2002-08-27 16:07 ` Michael H. Warfield
2002-08-28 19:14 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2002-08-29 2:05 ` Michael H. Warfield
2002-08-29 18:47 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2002-08-21 22:08 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-22 6:12 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-08-22 12:27 ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-22 18:22 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2002-08-22 18:26 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2002-08-22 19:19 ` Russell King
2002-09-12 15:06 ` Petr Baudis
2002-09-13 1:47 ` David S. Miller
2002-08-19 7:27 ` Chris Wedgwood
2002-08-19 12:25 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-19 22:39 ` Kelsey Hudson
2002-08-20 6:17 ` Val Henson
2002-08-19 23:56 Leif Sawyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1030040562.3090.47.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=ecki-news2002-08@lina.inka.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thunder@lightweight.ods.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®