mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [BENCHMARK] Preempt effect on 2.5.39 with contest 0.41
@ 2002-09-29  2:43 Con Kolivas
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Con Kolivas @ 2002-09-29  2:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

I've performed some benchmarks with the latest contest v0.41
(http://contest.kolivas.net) to determine what effect preemptible has on these
benchmarks and whether contest has the ability to show any effect.

Here are the benchmarks:

noload:
Kernel                  Time            CPU             Ratio
2.5.39                  73.17           93%             1.08
2.5.39-pe               73.03           94%             1.08

process_load:
Kernel                  Time            CPU             Ratio
2.5.39                  91.0            76%             1.31*
2.5.39-pe               83.6            82%             1.23

io_load:
Kernel                  Time            CPU             Ratio
2.5.39                  226             37%             3.20
2.5.39-pe               234             34%             3.43

mem_load:
Kernel                  Time            CPU             Ratio
2.5.39                  103.72          72%             1.53
2.5.39-pe               103.95          73%             1.54

The only statistically significant difference was in process_load where enabling
preempt made it faster. Well duh, what else what you expect? At least we can see
it is having the desired effect and not detrimental to any other area, and that
contest is able to show this effect.

Average of 5 runs when difference was noted, simplified for clarity.

Con.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [BENCHMARK] Preempt effect on 2.5.39 with contest 0.41
  2002-09-29  5:09 Dieter Nützel
@ 2002-09-29  5:59 ` Con Kolivas
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Con Kolivas @ 2002-09-29  5:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dieter Nützel; +Cc: Linux Kernel List

Quoting Dieter Nützel <Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>:

> Con,
> 
> can we please have 2.4.19-ck-pe furthermore for comparison, please?

Ok here's the full set as I have it (note ck7 is preempt and low latency ON; I
don't have results with it off):

noload:
Kernel                  Time            CPU             Ratio
2.4.19                  67.71           98%             1.00
2.4.19-ck7              69.62           94%             1.03
2.5.38                  72.38           94%             1.07
2.5.38-mm3              73.00           93%             1.08
2.5.39                  73.17           93%             1.08
2.5.39-pe               73.03           94%             1.08

process_load:
Kernel                  Time            CPU             Ratio
2.4.19                  110.75          57%             1.64
2.4.19-ck7              89.93           73%             1.33
2.5.38                  85.71           79%             1.27
2.5.38-mm3              96.32           72%             1.42
2.5.39                  91.0            76%             1.31
2.5.39-pe               83.6            82%             1.23

io_load:
Kernel                  Time            CPU             Ratio
2.4.19                  216.05          33%             3.19
2.4.19-ck7              118.69          57%             1.75
2.5.38                  887.76          8%              13.11
2.5.38-mm3              105.17          70%             1.55
2.5.39                  226             37%             3.20
2.5.39-pe               234             34%             3.43

mem_load:
Kernel                  Time            CPU             Ratio
2.4.19                  105.40          70%             1.56
2.4.19-ck7              92.54           80%             1.37
2.5.38                  107.89          73%             1.59
2.5.38-mm3              117.09          63%             1.73
2.5.39                  103.72          72%             1.53
2.5.39-pe               103.95          73%             1.54

Con.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [BENCHMARK] Preempt effect on 2.5.39 with contest 0.41
@ 2002-09-29  5:09 Dieter Nützel
  2002-09-29  5:59 ` Con Kolivas
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dieter Nützel @ 2002-09-29  5:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Con Kolivas; +Cc: Linux Kernel List

Con,

can we please have 2.4.19-ck-pe furthermore for comparison, please?

Thanks,
	Dieter
-- 
Dieter Nützel
Graduate Student, Computer Science

University of Hamburg
Department of Computer Science
@home: Dieter.Nuetzel at hamburg.de (replace at with @)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-09-29  5:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-09-29  2:43 [BENCHMARK] Preempt effect on 2.5.39 with contest 0.41 Con Kolivas
2002-09-29  5:09 Dieter Nützel
2002-09-29  5:59 ` Con Kolivas

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®