* Re: What kernels 2.4.x 2.5.x compile gcc3.2???
2002-10-15 18:49 What kernels 2.4.x 2.5.x compile gcc3.2??? clemens
@ 2002-10-15 18:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-10-16 11:31 ` Andre Costa
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Arjan van de Ven @ 2002-10-15 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: clemens; +Cc: linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 477 bytes --]
On Tue, 2002-10-15 at 20:49, clemens@dwf.com wrote:
> The subject just about says it.
> What versions of 2.4.x and 2.5.x compile cleanly with
> the new gcc 3.2 that is included in most recent releases
> (in particular RH8.0)
>
> The 2.4.18-14 kernel sources from RH have LOTS of patches,
> and they (well the modules) still dont compile with their
> own config file (sigh).
they do if you remember to use make mrproper when you switch from smp to
up or back...
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: What kernels 2.4.x 2.5.x compile gcc3.2???
2002-10-15 18:49 What kernels 2.4.x 2.5.x compile gcc3.2??? clemens
2002-10-15 18:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
@ 2002-10-16 11:31 ` Andre Costa
2002-10-16 13:10 ` Horst von Brand
2002-10-21 15:45 ` Alan Cox
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andre Costa @ 2002-10-16 11:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: clemens; +Cc: Linux kernel ML
Hi,
2.4.19 compiled just fine with gcc 3.2 here -- still using RH 7.1,
though (however, AFAIK RH dropped that "use-my-tweaked-compiler" thing
and shipped vanilla gcc 3.2 with RH 8.0).
HTH,
Andre
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 12:49:37 -0600
clemens@dwf.com wrote:
> The subject just about says it.
> What versions of 2.4.x and 2.5.x compile cleanly with
> the new gcc 3.2 that is included in most recent releases
> (in particular RH8.0)
>
> The 2.4.18-14 kernel sources from RH have LOTS of patches,
> and they (well the modules) still dont compile with their
> own config file (sigh).
>
>
> --
> Reg.Clemens
> reg@dwf.com
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Andre Oliveira da Costa
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: What kernels 2.4.x 2.5.x compile gcc3.2???
2002-10-15 18:49 What kernels 2.4.x 2.5.x compile gcc3.2??? clemens
2002-10-15 18:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-10-16 11:31 ` Andre Costa
@ 2002-10-16 13:10 ` Horst von Brand
2002-10-21 15:45 ` Alan Cox
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Horst von Brand @ 2002-10-16 13:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: clemens; +Cc: linux-kernel
clemens@dwf.com said:
> The subject just about says it.
> What versions of 2.4.x and 2.5.x compile cleanly with
> the new gcc 3.2 that is included in most recent releases
> (in particular RH8.0)
I've tried 2.4.19 and a bunch of 2.4.20-pre on RH rawhide and 8.0 (same
gcc), smooth sailing throughout; and also 2.5.x, 39 <= x or something like
that, with glitches mostly due to work in progress only.
> The 2.4.18-14 kernel sources from RH have LOTS of patches,
> and they (well the modules) still dont compile with their
> own config file (sigh).
Have you reported that at http://bugzilla.redhat.com? After triple-checking,
that is, I doubt it very much that RH builds their distribution kernels
with something other than the standard RH tools and configurations.
--
Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: What kernels 2.4.x 2.5.x compile gcc3.2???
2002-10-15 18:49 What kernels 2.4.x 2.5.x compile gcc3.2??? clemens
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2002-10-16 13:10 ` Horst von Brand
@ 2002-10-21 15:45 ` Alan Cox
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2002-10-21 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: clemens; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Tue, 2002-10-15 at 19:49, clemens@dwf.com wrote:
> The subject just about says it.
> What versions of 2.4.x and 2.5.x compile cleanly with
> the new gcc 3.2 that is included in most recent releases
> (in particular RH8.0)
2.4.18/19/20.. are fine. 2.2 isnt really tested.
> The 2.4.18-14 kernel sources from RH have LOTS of patches,
> and they (well the modules) still dont compile with their
> own config file (sigh).
Works for everyone else 8)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread