From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: "Pavan Kumar Reddy N.S." <pavan.kumar@wipro.com>
Cc: "'Linux-Kernel'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.5.xx kernel performance issue...
Date: 25 Oct 2002 10:20:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1035566442.19155.8.camel@rth.ninka.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000a01c27c28$0baa6e50$6009720a@wipro.com>
On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 06:11, Pavan Kumar Reddy N.S. wrote:
> TCP and AF_UNIX socket stream bandwidth has also got drastic change.
There is debugging code enabled for the loopback interface
in 2.5.x to test out some new features in the networking stack.
Once that debugging code is removed (say in 2.6.0) these performance
drops will drop.
I have to post this every time someone complains about lmbench
performance loss in 2.5.x
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-25 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-25 13:11 Pavan Kumar Reddy N.S.
2002-10-25 17:20 ` David S. Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1035566442.19155.8.camel@rth.ninka.net \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavan.kumar@wipro.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®