From: Daniel Egger <degger@fhm.edu>
To: reiser@namesys.com
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BK][PATCH] Reiser4, will double Linux FS performance, pleaseapply
Date: 06 Nov 2002 15:25:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1036592716.2654.14.camel@sonja.de.interearth.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DC87154.1030601@namesys.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 852 bytes --]
Am Mit, 2002-11-06 um 02.33 schrieb reiser:
> There is also a longer PhD thesis by her. 10 minutes is about as much
> work as I personally am willing to lose and try to remember. Avoiding
> 75% of writes instead of 20% is a substantial performance gain worth
> paying a cost for. Unfortunately it is not easy to say if it is worth
> that much cost, but I suspect it is. An approach we are exploring is
> for blocks to reach disk earlier than that if the device is not
> congested, on the grounds that if not much IO is occuring, then
> performance is not important.
Assuming your 10 minutes are just a default and tunable by sysctl I
hardly can see any problems at all. Paranoid people can set it to
make any tradeoff between performance and speed they'd like including
setting it to 0, no?
--
Servus,
Daniel
[-- Attachment #2: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-06 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <877555917@toto.iv>
2002-11-05 23:09 ` Peter Chubb
2002-11-06 1:33 ` reiser
2002-11-06 14:25 ` Daniel Egger [this message]
2002-11-07 17:19 ` Pavel Machek
2002-11-07 16:58 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-11-06 18:37 Tom Reinhart
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-31 21:23 [BK][PATCH] Reiser4, will double Linux FS performance, please apply Hans Reiser
2002-10-31 22:34 ` Dieter Nützel
2002-10-31 22:47 ` Hans Reiser
2002-11-01 1:17 ` [BK][PATCH] Reiser4, will double Linux FS performance, pleaseapply Andrew Morton
2002-11-01 1:27 ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-01 1:27 ` Hans Reiser
2002-11-01 1:33 ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-01 1:44 ` Dieter Nützel
2002-11-01 1:55 ` Hans Reiser
2002-11-01 10:23 ` Tomas Szepe
2002-11-01 17:19 ` Alexander Zarochentcev
2002-11-02 13:24 ` Tomas Szepe
2002-11-04 11:00 ` Nikita Danilov
2002-11-04 19:56 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-11-05 7:30 ` reiser
2002-11-05 8:28 ` Alexander Zarochentcev
2002-11-05 8:44 ` reiser
2002-11-05 8:49 ` Alexander Zarochentcev
2002-11-05 21:08 ` reiser
2002-11-05 9:29 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-11-05 21:39 ` reiser
2002-11-05 9:59 ` Tomas Szepe
2002-11-05 10:08 ` Alexander Zarochentcev
2002-11-05 10:23 ` Tomas Szepe
2002-11-05 10:46 ` Nikita Danilov
2002-11-02 13:38 ` Tomas Szepe
2002-11-04 12:02 ` Nikita Danilov
2002-11-04 17:10 ` Tomas Szepe
2002-11-04 17:53 ` Nikita Danilov
2002-11-04 18:10 ` Tomas Szepe
2002-11-01 4:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-01 10:59 ` Nikita Danilov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1036592716.2654.14.camel@sonja.de.interearth.com \
--to=degger@fhm.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reiser@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®