mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH][2.4] update ref counts on all allocated pages
@ 2002-11-27  0:07 Matt Porter
  2002-11-27 10:31 ` David S. Miller
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Matt Porter @ 2002-11-27  0:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

The following patch sets the ref count on all pages of an
allocation.  This allows an allocation with order>0 to be freed
via individual __free_page() calls within vfree().
  
This is important on non cache coherent processors which
have a pci_alloc_consistent/consistent_alloc() implementation
that involves creating a vmalloc area cache inhibited mapping
of allocated pages.
  
Because of this implementation, the implementation
of pci_free_consistent/consistent_free is done via
a vfree().  Without this patch only the first page
of the allocated memory is freed since successive pages
all have ref counts of zero.

-Matt

===== mm/page_alloc.c 1.56 vs edited =====
--- 1.56/mm/page_alloc.c	Tue Aug 20 04:39:48 2002
+++ edited/mm/page_alloc.c	Tue Nov 26 12:03:38 2002
@@ -203,6 +203,7 @@
 	struct list_head *head, *curr;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	struct page *page;
+	int i;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags);
 	do {
@@ -224,7 +225,10 @@
 			page = expand(zone, page, index, order, curr_order, area);
 			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags);
 
-			set_page_count(page, 1);
+			/* Set ref count on all pages */
+			for (i = 0; i < (1 << order); i++)
+				set_page_count(page+i, 1);
+
 			if (BAD_RANGE(zone,page))
 				BUG();
 			if (PageLRU(page))

-- 
Matt Porter
porter@cox.net
This is Linux Country. On a quiet night, you can hear Windows reboot.
-- 
Matt Porter
porter@cox.net
This is Linux Country. On a quiet night, you can hear Windows reboot.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH][2.4] update ref counts on all allocated pages
  2002-11-27  0:07 [PATCH][2.4] update ref counts on all allocated pages Matt Porter
@ 2002-11-27 10:31 ` David S. Miller
  2002-11-27 15:25   ` Matt Porter
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: David S. Miller @ 2002-11-27 10:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matt Porter; +Cc: linux-kernel

On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 16:07, Matt Porter wrote:
> The following patch sets the ref count on all pages of an
> allocation.  This allows an allocation with order>0 to be freed
> via individual __free_page() calls within vfree().

If your pci_alloc_consistent implementation is doing something
strang, _it_ should be doing the per-page reference counts.

Don't make every caller eat this overhead.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH][2.4] update ref counts on all allocated pages
  2002-11-27 10:31 ` David S. Miller
@ 2002-11-27 15:25   ` Matt Porter
  2002-11-28  3:33     ` David S. Miller
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Matt Porter @ 2002-11-27 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David S. Miller; +Cc: Matt Porter, linux-kernel

On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 02:31:31AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 16:07, Matt Porter wrote:
> > The following patch sets the ref count on all pages of an
> > allocation.  This allows an allocation with order>0 to be freed
> > via individual __free_page() calls within vfree().
> 
> If your pci_alloc_consistent implementation is doing something
> strang, _it_ should be doing the per-page reference counts.
> 
> Don't make every caller eat this overhead.

I'm surprised that's the recommended solution.  It seems pretty
dangerous to have allocated pages in the system where the per-page
ref counts are bogus.

To clarify then, on an order>0 allocation, it is only valid/defined
to free the same order of pages.  Is that a true statement?  If so,
I'll submit a docs patch and adjust our our local implementation.

Thanks,
-- 
Matt Porter
porter@cox.net
This is Linux Country. On a quiet night, you can hear Windows reboot.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH][2.4] update ref counts on all allocated pages
  2002-11-27 15:25   ` Matt Porter
@ 2002-11-28  3:33     ` David S. Miller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David S. Miller @ 2002-11-28  3:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matt Porter; +Cc: linux-kernel

On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 07:25, Matt Porter wrote:
> To clarify then, on an order>0 allocation, it is only valid/defined
> to free the same order of pages.  Is that a true statement?  If so,
> I'll submit a docs patch and adjust our our local implementation.

Yes, this is correct and it's what everyone does.  The exceptions
mess with the page counts themselves, look at the sparc64
pmd/pte dual-page allocations for example.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-11-28  3:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-11-27  0:07 [PATCH][2.4] update ref counts on all allocated pages Matt Porter
2002-11-27 10:31 ` David S. Miller
2002-11-27 15:25   ` Matt Porter
2002-11-28  3:33     ` David S. Miller

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®