From: "Trever L. Adams" <tadams-lists@myrealbox.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: David Ashley <dash@xdr.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.4.18 beats 2.5.50 in hard drive access????
Date: 06 Dec 2002 23:29:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1039235352.3232.22.camel@aurora.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1039227036.25004.0.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 21:10, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 23:00, David Ashley wrote:
> > hda is an IDE cdrom drive, but here it is:
>
> Ok that would explain why DMA is off on it. The disk puzzles me - for an
> OSB4 the code should be selecting MWDMA2
>
This may or may not be related. I am still trying to dig through the
ide code to see what changed, but 2.4.x will enable DMA on my disks.
2.5.x turns it off explicitly. As far as I have been able to figure in
my digging (just a half hour or so, so far), my drives aren't black
listed.
Anyway, when I did my initial tests I had scsi cd stuff, not ide (now I
am dropping scsi, so I have an ide cdrw). Here is the dmesg output from
2.4.x
Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 6.31
ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with
idebus=xx
VP_IDE: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 89
PCI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin A of device 00:11.1. Please try
using pci=biosirq.
VP_IDE: chipset revision 6
VP_IDE: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with
idebus=xx
VP_IDE: VIA vt8233 (rev 00) IDE UDMA100 controller on pci00:11.1
ide0: BM-DMA at 0xe000-0xe007, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:DMA
ide1: BM-DMA at 0xe008-0xe00f, BIOS settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:pio
hda: WDC WD136AA, ATA DISK drive
hdb: ATAPI CD-RW 40/12/48X, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
hdc: WDC WD153BA, ATA DISK drive
ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
hda: 26564832 sectors (13601 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=1653/255/63,
(U)DMA
hdc: 30043440 sectors (15382 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=29805/16/63,
UDMA(66)
ide-floppy driver 0.99.newide
Partition check:
hda: hda1 hda2 < hda5 >
hdc: [PTBL] [1870/255/63] hdc1 hdc2 hdc3
and 2.5.47 (From system logs):
Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 7.00alpha2
ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with
idebus=xx
Nov 19 17:14:50 aurora kernel: VP_IDE: IDE controller at PCI slot
00:11.1
PCI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin A of device 00:11.1. Please try
using pci=biosirq.
VP_IDE: chipset revision 6
VP_IDE: not 100%% native mode: will probe irqs later
ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with
idebus=xx
VP_IDE: VIA vt8233 (rev 00) IDE UDMA100 controller on pci00:11.1
ide0: BM-DMA at 0xe000-0xe007, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:DMA
ide1: BM-DMA at 0xe008-0xe00f, BIOS settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:pio
hda: WDC WD136AA, ATA DISK drive
hdb: ATAPI CD-RW 40/12/48X, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
hda: DMA disabled
hdb: DMA disabled
What is this?
Nov 19 19:09:06 aurora kernel: Speakup v-1.00 CVS: Tue Jun 11 14:22:53
EDT 2002
: initialized
Some kind of speech stuff or the kernel?
Anyway, 2.5.x does seem a little slower to me than 2.4.x on disk access
as well. This DMA disabled worries me.
Trever Adams
--
"Magazines all too frequently lead to books and should be regarded by
the prudent as the heavy petting of literature." -- Fran Lebowitz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-07 4:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-06 23:00 David Ashley
2002-12-07 2:10 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-07 4:29 ` Trever L. Adams [this message]
2002-12-08 1:55 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-08 3:28 ` Tomas Szepe
2002-12-08 17:27 ` Trever L. Adams
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-07 17:19 David Ashley
2002-12-07 15:25 David Ashley
2002-12-07 5:51 David Ashley
2002-12-07 3:02 Manish Lachwani
2002-12-07 2:48 David Ashley
2002-12-07 2:36 David Ashley
2002-12-06 23:02 Manish Lachwani
2002-12-06 19:29 David Ashley
2002-12-06 23:20 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1039235352.3232.22.camel@aurora.localdomain \
--to=tadams-lists@myrealbox.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=dash@xdr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®