From: David Ashley <dash@xdr.com>
To: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.18 beats 2.5.50 in hard drive access????
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 18:36:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200212070236.gB72aG513528@dave.home> (raw)
>Ok that would explain why DMA is off on it. The disk puzzles me - for an
>OSB4 the code should be selecting MWDMA2
In the BIOS I tried AUTO on all the drives. I have to explicitly enable
32 bit IO in the bios for each drive, it came up default off. I just enabled
it because 32 bit IO sounded better, but maybe it's not. I didn't try it
with it off. I also tried USER on all the drives where I can then set
the IO mode. There were 5 PIO settings possible plus 2 DMA things, which
I think were UDMA but I can't recall exactly. On all of those I chose the
UDMA2. Otherwise all the settings were identical to what AUTO set them.
Whether AUTO or USER made no difference in performance or in the kernel
messages.
I also have multi device support/raid 0/raid 5 enabled. The drives are
not partitioned, I use the drive itself in the /dev/md0 array. That's
why I get the kernel partition error messages.
I can try some stuff (except a reboot, until Monday). I'm off site now and
can't bring the machine down, but harmless experiments are ok, if there is
anything you want me to try.
-Dave
next reply other threads:[~2002-12-07 2:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-07 2:36 David Ashley [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-07 17:19 David Ashley
2002-12-07 15:25 David Ashley
2002-12-07 5:51 David Ashley
2002-12-07 3:02 Manish Lachwani
2002-12-07 2:48 David Ashley
2002-12-06 23:02 Manish Lachwani
2002-12-06 23:00 David Ashley
2002-12-07 2:10 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-07 4:29 ` Trever L. Adams
2002-12-08 1:55 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-08 3:28 ` Tomas Szepe
2002-12-08 17:27 ` Trever L. Adams
2002-12-06 19:29 David Ashley
2002-12-06 23:20 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200212070236.gB72aG513528@dave.home \
--to=dash@xdr.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®