From: Martin Josefsson <gandalf@wlug.westbo.se>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] "interactivity changes", sched-2.5.64-B2
Date: 07 Mar 2003 22:05:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1047071156.29990.5.camel@tux.rsn.bth.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303072136590.22681-100000@localhost.localdomain>
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 21:39, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> On 7 Mar 2003, Martin Josefsson wrote:
>
> > Some negative things:
>
> if you have time/interest, could you re-test the negative things with X
> reniced to -10, to further isolate the problem? Another thing to try is to
> renice xmms to -10 (or RT priority). Which one makes the larger
> difference?
X niced to -10 makes the xmms mouse-jerkyness disappear. but it can
still skip right after a songchange. If I renice xmms to -10 as well I
get the mouse-jerkyness again, it I renice it to -5 it seems to behave
quite well, no mouse-jerkyness and so far I havn't heard any skips, but
it can take some time until a skip occurs.
With X reniced to -10 it feels like the wiggle_a_window while a
'make -j10' and a movie is playing gets a bit more sluggish.
And sawfish still takes 30 second naps when executing a bunch of
aumix's.
--
/Martin
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-07 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <5.2.0.9.2.20030307093435.01a8fe88@pop.gmx.net>
2003-03-07 9:30 ` [patch] "HT scheduler", sched-2.5.63-B3 Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303071003060.6318-100000@localhost.localdom ain>
2003-03-07 9:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2003-03-07 10:03 ` [patch] "interactivity changes", sched-2.5.64-B2 Ingo Molnar
2003-03-07 14:45 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303071543480.12493-100000@localhost.localdo main>
2003-03-07 15:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2003-03-07 18:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-07 18:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-07 19:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-07 19:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-07 19:31 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303071049500.7326-100000@localhost.localdom ain>
2003-03-07 10:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2003-03-07 12:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2003-03-07 13:27 ` Mike Galbraith
2003-03-07 14:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-07 20:34 ` Martin Josefsson
2003-03-07 20:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-07 21:05 ` Martin Josefsson [this message]
2003-03-07 21:47 ` Martin Josefsson
2003-03-07 21:03 ` David Lang
2003-03-07 21:13 ` Martin Josefsson
2003-03-07 23:05 ` Helge Hafting
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1047071156.29990.5.camel@tux.rsn.bth.se \
--to=gandalf@wlug.westbo.se \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®