mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Josefsson <gandalf@wlug.westbo.se>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
	Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] "interactivity changes", sched-2.5.64-B2
Date: 07 Mar 2003 22:47:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1047073649.29990.45.camel@tux.rsn.bth.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1047071156.29990.5.camel@tux.rsn.bth.se>

On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 22:05, Martin Josefsson wrote:

> And sawfish still takes 30 second naps when executing a bunch of
> aumix's.

For information: this is 2.5.64 + sched-2.5.64-B2, no preempt or other
patches.

I changed the command that sawfish executes to only append the current
date to a file and then I made it take a nap again.

I got a file containing 57 lines, one for each time the command was
executed by sawfish.

it took 41 seconds to execute the command 57 times and the machine was
very idle during that time.

According to top sawfish's priority is between 15 and 20 the whole time.
And as I said the machine is very idle during the test.

The command was a very small bashscript:

#!/bin/bash

date >> /tmp/result


So no aumix executed in the script, didn't want another error factor in
the test.

I've reproduced the problem three times and this is what I got:

executions   time
----------   ----
    57        41 seconds
    52        39 seconds
    28        25 seconds


results from the third run

Fri Mar  7 22:31:00 CET 2003
Fri Mar  7 22:31:02 CET 2003
Fri Mar  7 22:31:03 CET 2003
Fri Mar  7 22:31:04 CET 2003
Fri Mar  7 22:31:05 CET 2003
Fri Mar  7 22:31:06 CET 2003
Fri Mar  7 22:31:07 CET 2003
Fri Mar  7 22:31:07 CET 2003
Fri Mar  7 22:31:07 CET 2003
Fri Mar  7 22:31:09 CET 2003
Fri Mar  7 22:31:10 CET 2003
Fri Mar  7 22:31:11 CET 2003
Fri Mar  7 22:31:12 CET 2003
Fri Mar  7 22:31:14 CET 2003
Fri Mar  7 22:31:14 CET 2003
Fri Mar  7 22:31:14 CET 2003
Fri Mar  7 22:31:15 CET 2003
Fri Mar  7 22:31:16 CET 2003
Fri Mar  7 22:31:17 CET 2003
Fri Mar  7 22:31:18 CET 2003
Fri Mar  7 22:31:19 CET 2003
Fri Mar  7 22:31:19 CET 2003
Fri Mar  7 22:31:19 CET 2003
Fri Mar  7 22:31:20 CET 2003
Fri Mar  7 22:31:22 CET 2003
Fri Mar  7 22:31:23 CET 2003
Fri Mar  7 22:31:24 CET 2003
Fri Mar  7 22:31:25 CET 2003

Do you have any clues to what might be happening?

-- 
/Martin

Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.

  reply	other threads:[~2003-03-07 21:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <5.2.0.9.2.20030307093435.01a8fe88@pop.gmx.net>
2003-03-07  9:30 ` [patch] "HT scheduler", sched-2.5.63-B3 Ingo Molnar
     [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303071003060.6318-100000@localhost.localdom ain>
2003-03-07  9:38   ` Mike Galbraith
2003-03-07 10:03     ` [patch] "interactivity changes", sched-2.5.64-B2 Ingo Molnar
2003-03-07 14:45       ` Ingo Molnar
     [not found]       ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303071543480.12493-100000@localhost.localdo main>
2003-03-07 15:44         ` Mike Galbraith
2003-03-07 18:50           ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-07 18:55             ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-07 19:10             ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-07 19:13               ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-07 19:31               ` Ingo Molnar
     [not found]     ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303071049500.7326-100000@localhost.localdom ain>
2003-03-07 10:23       ` Mike Galbraith
2003-03-07 12:54         ` Mike Galbraith
2003-03-07 13:27           ` Mike Galbraith
2003-03-07 14:43             ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-07 20:34               ` Martin Josefsson
2003-03-07 20:39                 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-07 21:05                   ` Martin Josefsson
2003-03-07 21:47                     ` Martin Josefsson [this message]
2003-03-07 21:03                 ` David Lang
2003-03-07 21:13                   ` Martin Josefsson
2003-03-07 23:05                     ` Helge Hafting

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1047073649.29990.45.camel@tux.rsn.bth.se \
    --to=gandalf@wlug.westbo.se \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rml@tech9.net \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®