From: Mark Haverkamp <markh@osdl.org>
To: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
dougg@torque.net, Christoffer Hall-Frederiksen <hall@jiffies.dk>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux aacraid devel <linux-aacraid-devel@dell.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with aacraid driver in 2.5.63-bk-latest
Date: 13 Mar 2003 15:22:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1047597729.30103.386.camel@markh1.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E711194.9010505@redhat.com>
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 15:17, Doug Ledford wrote:
> Mark Haverkamp wrote:
>
> > Does the cmd_per_lun element of the Scsi_Host_Template structure serve
> > more than one purpose?
>
> Only when inappropriately abused by LLDD authors. The cmd_per_lun value
> is suppossed to be for untagged devices only! If you have a tape drive
> that doesn't support tagged commands but you want to be able to
> internally have the next command queued up and ready to go when the
> current command completes (in order to keep it streaming better), then
> you can set cmd_per_lun to 2 and you will get two outstanding commands
> for this device at a time. I used that so that in my interrupt handler
> I could send the next command to the device before I passed the
> completed command up to the SCSI layer.
>
> > In scsi_alloc_sdev it is passed into
> > scsi_adjust_queue_depth. In the aacraid case this is 512. Later the
> > aacraid driver (in aac_slave_configure) sets the queue depth to either
> > 128 for tagged or 1 if not.
>
> That's where you are suppossed to set the queue depth on tagged devices.
Then it sounds like the aacraid driver could set cmd_per_lun to a small
number like one since the real queue depth will be set later in
aac_slave_configure.
Mark.
--
Mark Haverkamp <markh@osdl.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-13 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20030228133037.GB7473@jiffies.dk>
2003-03-12 23:06 ` Mark Haverkamp
2003-03-13 0:18 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-12 23:55 ` Douglas Gilbert
2003-03-13 1:06 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-13 0:50 ` Mike Anderson
2003-03-13 23:13 ` Mark Haverkamp
2003-03-14 7:05 ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-03-14 10:18 ` Mike Anderson
2003-03-13 1:31 ` Douglas Gilbert
2003-03-13 23:27 ` Doug Ledford
2003-03-13 15:42 ` Mark Haverkamp
2003-03-13 23:17 ` Doug Ledford
2003-03-13 23:22 ` Mark Haverkamp [this message]
2003-03-13 23:25 ` Doug Ledford
2003-03-14 14:57 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-14 15:34 ` Mark Haverkamp
2003-03-14 16:48 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-03 10:05 Christoffer Hall-Frederiksen
2003-03-03 13:40 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-03 14:46 ` Christoffer Hall-Frederiksen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1047597729.30103.386.camel@markh1.pdx.osdl.net \
--to=markh@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=dougg@torque.net \
--cc=hall@jiffies.dk \
--cc=linux-aacraid-devel@dell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®