From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATCH - Don't remove inode from hash until filesystem has deleted it.
Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 09:06:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1052467585.23135.97.camel@passion.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16057.46720.778667.845306@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au>
On Thu, 2003-05-08 at 02:44, Neil Brown wrote:
> Don't remove inode from hash until filesystem has deleted it.
>
> There is a small race with knfsd using iget to get an inode
> that is currently being deleted. This is because it is removed
> from the hash table *before* the filesystem gets to delete it.
> If nfsd does an iget in this window it will cause a read_inode which
> will return an apparently valid inode. However that inode will
> shortly be deleted from disc without knfsd noticing... until
> it is too late.
JFFS2 suffers similarly from the VFS simultaneously calling read_inode()
and clear_inode() for the same inode, since it uses iget() internally
for garbage collection. Since deletion is a slow operation which
involves marking nodes obsolete on the medium, it's nice and easy to hit
the race and have jffs2_read_inode() start walking the list of nodes
belonging to a certain inode at the same time as jffs2_clear_inode() is
walking the same list freeing them all :)
I've added locking to prevent this from happening in that particular
case, by suspending garbage collection during jffs2_clear_inode(), but
that's undesirable and anyway, the problem still exists when a JFFS2
file system is exported by nfsd, if nfsd attempts to open the inode
while it's being deleted.
Your patch should solve that too -- looks sane to me.
--
dwmw2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-09 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-08 1:44 Neil Brown
2003-05-08 20:43 ` Jan Harkes
2003-05-09 4:36 ` Neil Brown
2003-05-09 8:06 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2003-05-09 22:24 ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-12 0:41 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1052467585.23135.97.camel@passion.cambridge.redhat.com \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®