mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: Margit Schubert-While <margitsw@t-online.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PCI cache line messages 2.4/2.5
Date: 05 Jun 2003 11:39:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1054809554.15276.8.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EDE7522.8040206@pobox.com>

On Mer, 2003-06-04 at 23:39, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > PCI: 00:1d.7 PCI cache line size set incorrectly (0 bytes) by BIOS/FW.
> > PCI: 00:1d.7 PCI cache line size corrected to 128.
> > 
> > This is the onboard USB EHCI (Intel D845 PESV).
> > lspci below.
> > 
> > What's going on ?
> 
> 
> Pretty much exactly what the message says :)
> 
> Your BIOS did not set the PCI cache line size correctly.  The kernel 
> caught that mistake, and fixed it.

I can't find anywhere the BIOS is obliged to set it for you if a PnP OS
is installed, ditto in the presence of any form of hotplug the test is
wrong.

As far as I can see you can only warn if MWI is already set in the
control word, and (I'd have to check the spec) possibly if the
cache line size is non zero.

(simple hotplug thought experiment to prove the point

	Soft boot a thinkpad 600
	As the bios transfers to grub insert in docking station
	
explain how the bios sets the cache line size..)


  reply	other threads:[~2003-06-05 10:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-02  6:59 Margit Schubert-While
2003-06-04 22:39 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-06-05 10:39   ` Alan Cox [this message]
2003-06-05 11:05     ` David S. Miller
2003-06-05 11:20       ` Alan Cox
2003-06-05 11:25         ` David S. Miller
2003-06-05 19:48           ` Alan Cox
2003-06-06  5:11             ` David S. Miller
2003-06-06 15:27               ` Alan Cox
2003-06-06 15:30                 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-05  6:12 Margit Schubert-While
2003-06-05 11:58 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2003-06-05 15:23 Margit Schubert-While
2003-06-06 12:06 ` Ivan Kokshaysky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1054809554.15276.8.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk \
    --to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=margitsw@t-online.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®