mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
	Margit Schubert-While <margitsw@t-online.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PCI cache line messages 2.4/2.5
Date: 05 Jun 2003 04:05:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1054811157.19407.3.camel@rth.ninka.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1054809554.15276.8.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk>

On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 03:39, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Your BIOS did not set the PCI cache line size correctly.  The kernel 
> > caught that mistake, and fixed it.
> 
> I can't find anywhere the BIOS is obliged to set it for you if a PnP OS
> is installed, ditto in the presence of any form of hotplug the test is
> wrong.
> 
> As far as I can see you can only warn if MWI is already set in the
> control word, and (I'd have to check the spec) possibly if the
> cache line size is non zero.

I don't know how PnP OS plays into it, but the last time I dug into this
deep dark area, the BIOS was expected to setup the cache line size for
all PCI devices in the system.

I do specifically remember situations, involving Acenic cards, where
one Acenic card would have things setup correctly but for whatever
reason the BIOS decided not to init the other Acenic cards.

-- 
David S. Miller <davem@redhat.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2003-06-05 10:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-02  6:59 Margit Schubert-While
2003-06-04 22:39 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-06-05 10:39   ` Alan Cox
2003-06-05 11:05     ` David S. Miller [this message]
2003-06-05 11:20       ` Alan Cox
2003-06-05 11:25         ` David S. Miller
2003-06-05 19:48           ` Alan Cox
2003-06-06  5:11             ` David S. Miller
2003-06-06 15:27               ` Alan Cox
2003-06-06 15:30                 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-05  6:12 Margit Schubert-While
2003-06-05 11:58 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2003-06-05 15:23 Margit Schubert-While
2003-06-06 12:06 ` Ivan Kokshaysky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1054811157.19407.3.camel@rth.ninka.net \
    --to=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=margitsw@t-online.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®