[QUESTION] What about EtherLeak report from @stake

[QUESTION] What about EtherLeak report from @stake

[Martin Zwickel]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 419 bytes --]

Hi there!

What do you think about this:

http://www.atstake.com/research/advisories/2003/atstake_etherleak_report.pdf
http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/412115

Are those padding bug's fixed in >=2.5.x/2.4.21?

Or isn't it that critical?

Regards,
Martin

-- 
MyExcuse:
spaghetti cable cause packet failure

Martin Zwickel <martin.zwickel@technotrend.de>
Research & Development

TechnoTrend AG <http://www.technotrend.de>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [QUESTION] What about EtherLeak report from @stake

[Andre Tomt]

On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 17:24, Martin Zwickel wrote:
> Hi there!
> 
> What do you think about this:
> 
> http://www.atstake.com/research/advisories/2003/atstake_etherleak_report.pdf
> http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/412115
> 
> Are those padding bug's fixed in >=2.5.x/2.4.21?
> 
> Or isn't it that critical?


It was fixed in 2.4.x early 2.4.21-pre, and in 2.2.2x sometime I dont
really recall. It's also fixed in 2.5.x, according to linux.bkbits.net.

Most vendor kernels are fixed, too.

-- 
Cheers,
André Tomt

Re: [QUESTION] What about EtherLeak report from @stake

[John Bradford]

> Are those padding bug's fixed in >=2.5.x/2.4.21?

I think fixes for most, if not all drivers were in mainline by 2.4.21-pre5.

John.