From: Paul Venezia <pvenezia@jpj.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: I/O issues, iowait problems, 2.4 v 2.6
Date: 10 Nov 2003 23:02:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1068523328.25805.97.camel@soul.jpj.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031110195433.4331b75e.akpm@osdl.org>
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 22:54, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Eventually, the bottleneck disappears,
> > and the performance increases, but never substantially.
>
> It's not clear here what direction the data is being transferred in. Is it
> mostly client->server, or mostly server->client?
Seems to be bidirectional.
> What filesystem is the server using?
ext3
> In which direction was the file transferred? client to server or server to
> client? What kernel was running on each?
The client is running AS2.1, RH's 2.4.9-e12. Server is RH AS 3.0, 2.4.22
stock, and 2.6.0-test9, 2.6.0-test9-bk11. Transfers in both directions.
>
> As next steps I'd suggest that you log into the server and do
>
> time (dd if=/dev/zero of=x bs=1M count=2048 ; sync)
>
> and
>
> time (dd if=x of=/dev/null bs=1M count=2048 ; sync)
>
> (this assumes that the machine has less that 2G of memory, to avoid caching
> effects).
The raw file read/write is the ticket. The box tightens right up at 100% iowait.
I'd done bonnie++ i/o tests already, and except for an apparent NPTL issue on the per char,
the block i/o numbers were fine; no abnormal results whatsoever. In fact, block r/w
numbers were improved compared to 2.4.22. Now that I'm looking for it, however, I
do note extremely elevated iowait numbers during a bonnie++ run. Something in the MPT
modules?
-Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-11 4:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-11 2:53 Paul Venezia
2003-11-11 3:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-11 3:54 ` Andrew Morton
2003-11-11 4:02 ` Paul Venezia [this message]
2003-11-11 4:28 ` Andrew Morton
2003-11-11 4:22 ` Paul Venezia
2003-11-11 4:24 ` Paul Venezia
2003-11-11 4:54 ` Andrew Morton
2003-11-11 4:55 ` Paul Venezia
2003-11-11 5:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-11 5:13 ` Paul Venezia
2003-11-11 5:29 ` Paul Venezia
2003-11-11 5:50 ` Andrew Morton
2003-11-11 6:04 ` Paul Venezia
2003-11-11 5:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-11 4:12 ` Paul Venezia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1068523328.25805.97.camel@soul.jpj.net \
--to=pvenezia@jpj.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®