From: Paul Venezia <pvenezia@jpj.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: I/O issues, iowait problems, 2.4 v 2.6
Date: 10 Nov 2003 23:22:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1068524553.22809.108.camel@soul.jpj.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031110202819.7e7433a8.akpm@osdl.org>
>
> Well that's nice and simple. Could you please run `vmstat 1' during that
> big `dd'? Wait for everything to achieve steady state, send us twenty
> lines of the vmstat trace?
I'd pulled this before, here's the output.
> >
> > I'd done bonnie++ i/o tests already, and except for an apparent NPTL issue on the per char,
> > the block i/o numbers were fine; no abnormal results whatsoever. In fact, block r/w
> > numbers were improved compared to 2.4.22. Now that I'm looking for it, however, I
> > do note extremely elevated iowait numbers during a bonnie++ run. Something in the MPT
> > modules?
>
> Greater than 90% I/O wait is to be expected in these tests. What is of
> interest is the overall bandwidth.2.5 megabytes per second is very broken.
Definitely. I should have noted that the 2.4.22 tests on that dd came
back in 23.607s, the 2.6.0 tests hadn't returned for over 4 minutes.
> 2.5 megabytes per second is very
> broken. I have a 53c1030 box here which uses the MPT fusion driver and it
> happily does 50MB/sec to a single disk, but I guess that's a different
> setup.
This is a 53C1030 with a RAID1 mirror. Now that I think about it, I did
the >2GB bonnie tests on a single disk, no mirror. I'll rerun the i/o
tests with this setup and then remove the mirror and see what happens.
-Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-11 4:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-11 2:53 Paul Venezia
2003-11-11 3:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-11 3:54 ` Andrew Morton
2003-11-11 4:02 ` Paul Venezia
2003-11-11 4:28 ` Andrew Morton
2003-11-11 4:22 ` Paul Venezia [this message]
2003-11-11 4:24 ` Paul Venezia
2003-11-11 4:54 ` Andrew Morton
2003-11-11 4:55 ` Paul Venezia
2003-11-11 5:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-11 5:13 ` Paul Venezia
2003-11-11 5:29 ` Paul Venezia
2003-11-11 5:50 ` Andrew Morton
2003-11-11 6:04 ` Paul Venezia
2003-11-11 5:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-11 4:12 ` Paul Venezia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1068524553.22809.108.camel@soul.jpj.net \
--to=pvenezia@jpj.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®