From: Pat LaVarre <p.lavarre@ieee.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Erez Zadok" <ezk@cs.sunysb.edu>,
"Jörn Engel" <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>,
"Phillip Lougher" <phillip@lougher.demon.co.uk>,
"Kallol Biswas" <kbiswas@neoscale.com>
Subject: Re: partially encrypted filesystem
Date: 05 Dec 2003 12:58:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1070654324.12411.478.camel@patibmrh9> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031205191447.GC29469@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
> ... but I don't think Linux has very good support for filesystems that
> want to drop 64 pages into the page cache when the VM/VFS only asked
> for one.
>
> If it did, that would allow ext2/3 to grow block sizes beyond the
> current 4k limit on i386, which would be a good thing to do. Or
> perhaps we just need to bite the bullet and increase PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
> to something bigger, like 64k. People are going to want that on
> 32-bit systems soon anyway.
Issue now yes. Three pieces of evidence:
1)
I hear CD-RW commonly report 64 KiB per write block, DVD-RAM/ DVD+RW
often report 32 KiB per write block.
2)
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=106700651518749
Subject: Re: aligned /dev/scd$n reads less rare how
Date: 2003-10-24 14:41:16
is me saying a naive lk 2.6 test like `dd if=/dev/scd0 bs=1M` doesn't
yet improve read thruput by polite alignment, much less improve write
thruput by polite alignment.
Specifically I see we lose alignment in the second cdb and following,
til the end of the disc.
3)
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=107004995921559
Subject: cdrom sr ide-cd - CDC_WR, 1999 op x46 GPCMD_GET_CONFIGURATION
Date: 2003-11-28 20:05:03
is me saying cdrom.ko does not yet fetch via SCSI over whatever (USB2HS/
ATAPIUDMA133/ 1394a/ ...) the 1999 ANSI T10 standard plug 'n play
descriptor that distinguishes the 32/64 KiB bytes per write block from
the 2 KiB bytes per read block. (Relevant patches appear incomplete,
nearby.)
Pat LaVarre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-05 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-03 21:07 Kallol Biswas
2003-12-03 21:44 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-12-03 23:20 ` bill davidsen
2003-12-03 21:44 ` Jörn Engel
2003-12-04 0:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-04 1:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-12-04 2:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-04 3:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-12-04 2:37 ` Charles Manning
2003-12-04 14:17 ` Jörn Engel
2003-12-04 15:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-04 16:07 ` Phillip Lougher
2003-12-04 17:26 ` Jörn Engel
2003-12-04 18:20 ` Phillip Lougher
2003-12-04 18:40 ` Jörn Engel
2003-12-04 19:41 ` Erez Zadok
2003-12-05 11:20 ` Jörn Engel
2003-12-05 16:16 ` Erez Zadok
2003-12-05 19:14 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-12-05 19:47 ` Erez Zadok
2003-12-05 20:28 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-12-05 21:38 ` Pat LaVarre
2003-12-06 0:15 ` Maciej Zenczykowski
2003-12-06 1:35 ` Pat LaVarre
2003-12-06 2:39 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-12-06 11:43 ` Maciej Zenczykowski
2003-12-07 0:04 ` Shaya Potter
2003-12-08 14:08 ` Jörn Engel
2003-12-06 0:50 ` Phillip Lougher
2003-12-08 11:37 ` David Woodhouse
2003-12-08 13:44 ` phillip
2003-12-08 14:07 ` David Woodhouse
2003-12-10 1:16 ` [OT?]Re: " Charles Manning
2003-12-10 17:45 ` Phillip Lougher
2003-12-09 23:40 ` Pat LaVarre
2003-12-10 0:07 ` Pavel Machek
2003-12-10 1:28 ` Pat LaVarre
2003-12-10 2:13 ` Charles Manning
2003-12-05 19:58 ` Pat LaVarre [this message]
2003-12-08 11:28 ` David Woodhouse
2003-12-08 13:49 ` phillip
2003-12-04 19:18 ` David Wagner
2003-12-05 13:02 ` Jörn Engel
2003-12-05 17:28 ` Frank v Waveren
2003-12-05 23:59 ` David Wagner
2003-12-19 15:01 ` Rik van Riel
2003-12-04 3:10 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-12-04 18:16 ` Hans Reiser
2003-12-06 19:56 Pat LaVarre
2003-12-06 22:07 ` Maciej Zenczykowski
2003-12-10 3:22 Valient Gough
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1070654324.12411.478.camel@patibmrh9 \
--to=p.lavarre@ieee.org \
--cc=ezk@cs.sunysb.edu \
--cc=joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de \
--cc=kbiswas@neoscale.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phillip@lougher.demon.co.uk \
--cc=willy@debian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®