From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: "Michel Dänzer" <michel@daenzer.net>
Cc: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@yahoo.com>,
DRI Devel <dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] 2.6 kernel change in nopage
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2004 17:55:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1072979706.28413.1.camel@dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1072965029.1603.261.camel@thor.asgaard.local>
On Iau, 2004-01-01 at 13:50, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > Okay, you did something weird with nopage args, but I thought I did
> > the equivalent of this in the original patch?
>
> This is about the canonical DRM code in the DRI tree.
99.9% of people run the DRM code in the kernel tree, so definitions of
canonical might vary. I don't personally see a problem with the ifdefs.
The DRI devel tree has to work with anything, the kernel gets the luxury
of being able to strip out the defines that aren't needed for that
specific release.
Alan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-01 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20031231182148.26486.qmail@web14918.mail.yahoo.com>
2004-01-01 12:03 ` Michel Dänzer
2004-01-01 12:10 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-01-01 12:23 ` Michel Dänzer
2004-01-01 12:28 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-01-01 14:27 ` Michel Dänzer
2004-01-01 15:06 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-01-01 20:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-01 20:57 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-01-01 22:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-10 21:54 ` Michel Dänzer
2004-01-10 22:08 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-01-11 0:15 ` Michel Dänzer
2004-01-01 13:33 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-01-01 13:50 ` Michel Dänzer
2004-01-01 14:13 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-01-01 17:55 ` Alan Cox [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1072979706.28413.1.camel@dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jonsmirl@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michel@daenzer.net \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®