* Races in sleep_on()
[not found] ` <20040122005436.5895d7bb.akpm@osdl.org>
@ 2004-01-22 12:57 ` David Woodhouse
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: David Woodhouse @ 2004-01-22 12:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 00:54 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Yes. That's why I advocated the BUG_ON(!BKL) a _long_ time ago. Arjan
> > had a huge list of bogus callers even in 2.4.
>
> So... do me a patch which does a WARN_ON()? Make sure that it shuts
> itself up after the first five messages so people don't hate us too much.
>
> To get best coverage you'll need to make the !CONFIG_SMP&&!CONFIG_PREEMPT
> version of lock_kernel() set a flag or something.
Since the spinlock is a NOP anyway there doesn't seem to be any harm in
just letting the UP version use the same code as the SMP/PREEMPT
versions.
I've done the _timeout versions too, despite the frequent whinge that
'it's OK if we miss wakeups because we time out eventually anyway'. That
argument was never acceptable to me anyway.
===== include/linux/smp_lock.h 1.7 vs edited =====
--- 1.7/include/linux/smp_lock.h Mon Jan 19 23:38:11 2004
+++ edited/include/linux/smp_lock.h Thu Jan 22 09:15:17 2004
@@ -5,7 +5,9 @@
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
-#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT)
+#define BKL_DEBUG /* For testing for sleep_on() abuse */
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT) || defined(BKL_DEBUG)
extern spinlock_t kernel_flag;
===== kernel/sched.c 1.236 vs edited =====
--- 1.236/kernel/sched.c Mon Jan 19 23:38:12 2004
+++ edited/kernel/sched.c Thu Jan 22 10:49:55 2004
@@ -1903,10 +1903,21 @@
__remove_wait_queue(q, &wait); \
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock, flags);
+#define SLEEP_ON_BKLCHECK \
+ if (unlikely(!kernel_locked()) && \
+ sleep_on_bkl_warnings < 10) { \
+ sleep_on_bkl_warnings++; \
+ WARN_ON(1); \
+ }
+
+static int sleep_on_bkl_warnings;
+
void interruptible_sleep_on(wait_queue_head_t *q)
{
SLEEP_ON_VAR
+ SLEEP_ON_BKLCHECK
+
current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
SLEEP_ON_HEAD
@@ -1920,6 +1931,8 @@
{
SLEEP_ON_VAR
+ SLEEP_ON_BKLCHECK
+
current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
SLEEP_ON_HEAD
@@ -1935,6 +1948,8 @@
{
SLEEP_ON_VAR
+ SLEEP_ON_BKLCHECK
+
current->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
SLEEP_ON_HEAD
@@ -1947,6 +1962,8 @@
long sleep_on_timeout(wait_queue_head_t *q, long timeout)
{
SLEEP_ON_VAR
+
+ SLEEP_ON_BKLCHECK
current->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
--
dwmw2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2004-01-22 12:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <E1AjOdk-0000pG-Ah@thunk.org>
[not found] ` <874qup9dml.fsf@rover.gag.com>
[not found] ` <20040121231522.GC3780@thunk.org>
[not found] ` <1074757117.16045.201.camel@imladris.demon.co.uk>
[not found] ` <20040122083643.GM1016@holomorphy.com>
[not found] ` <1074760818.16750.1026.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20040122005436.5895d7bb.akpm@osdl.org>
2004-01-22 12:57 ` Races in sleep_on() David Woodhouse
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®