From: Paul P <ppak_98@yahoo.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: unexpected extra pollout events from epoll
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 17:58:49 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <107660.83879.qm@web56306.mail.re3.yahoo.com> (raw)
> You do that by writing data until it's finished, or you
> get EAGAIN. If you
> get EAGAIN, you listen for EPOLLOUT.
> Reading is same, but you'd wait for EPOLLIN.
I've got a few questions about this approach. The most logical
way to do this seems to be:
1) Leave the epoll_wait with the EPOLLIN|EPOLLOUT event flags and
use epoll_ctl to switch the interest mask for each fd between EPOLLIN
and EPOLLOUT on a per fd basis.
2) When I'm ready to write, I do a write and if it does not fully
write and I get the EAGAIN flag, I switch the fd with epoll_ctl(fd,MOD,EPOLLOUT).
However, I get strange behavior when I tried adding fd's with only the
EPOLLIN interest mask. If I use epoll_wait with both the EPOLLIN and
EPOLLOUT interest mask, but add fd's with only the EPOLLIN interest mask,
I still seem to get EPOLLOUT events on the fd.
Am I supposed to change the main loop with epoll_wait so that when one
socket is reading that I switch the main loop to get EPOLLOUT events?
That means that I'm not receiving on any fd while I'm sending, so this
probably isn't right.
So, I'm a little confused.
Thanks in advance.
Paul
next reply other threads:[~2008-10-27 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-27 0:58 Paul P [this message]
2008-10-27 1:18 ` Davide Libenzi
2008-10-27 1:23 ` Davide Libenzi
2008-10-27 3:48 ` Paul P
[not found] <fa.iE6LeMsZ2b+Y7nnAUJEFSvwEiiU@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.KeDEgbYh8k5LzzH6uv7u00N5twU@ifi.uio.no>
2008-10-27 5:59 ` Robert Hancock
[not found] <fa.YTdIGxaBsWvyaUnxBGIS1f8F2BM@ifi.uio.no>
2008-10-26 16:43 ` Robert Hancock
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-10-26 14:42 Paul P
2008-10-26 22:07 ` Davide Libenzi
2008-10-26 22:48 ` Paul P
2008-10-26 23:12 ` Davide Libenzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=107660.83879.qm@web56306.mail.re3.yahoo.com \
--to=ppak_98@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome