mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul P <ppak_98@yahoo.com>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: unexpected extra pollout events from epoll
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:48:35 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <420026.83313.qm@web56306.mail.re3.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0810261812510.19212@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>

> Which version of epoll do you have? The epoll_wait()
> function does not 
> accept an event mask (like you write above,
> EPOLLIN|EPOLLOUT). 

lol, I was a bit tired when I wrote that.  Ok, ignore the stuff related 
to epoll_wait in my previous post.
 
> As optimization, if the EPOLLOUT bit is already set, you
> don't need to 
> keep calling epoll_ctl(fd,MOD,EPOLLOUT).

This is good to know.

So, I've got a few questions about what happens to data that accumulates 
while I am sending and the fd is set to EPOLLOUT?  If I am send out a 
large buffer and incoming data wants to stream in on a full duplex 
connection, what happens to that data when I am processing the socket 
while it is in epollout mode?  

Is the following accurate?  When data comes in while I am sending, I guess 
the data fills up the receive buffers until they are full and then it 
stops accepting data until it is cleared out?  When I switch back to 
EPOLLIN, I'm guessing that I will get a notification on that fd that there 
is data waiting.

The other question I have is there a way to do full-duplex networking so 
that I can receive network messages while I am sending or vice versa?  It 
seems that the method of switching the socket between EPOLLIN and EPOLLOUT 
means that I can't do both operations simultaneously.  Thanks

Paul


      

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-10-27  3:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-27  0:58 Paul P
2008-10-27  1:18 ` Davide Libenzi
2008-10-27  1:23   ` Davide Libenzi
2008-10-27  3:48   ` Paul P [this message]
     [not found] <fa.iE6LeMsZ2b+Y7nnAUJEFSvwEiiU@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.KeDEgbYh8k5LzzH6uv7u00N5twU@ifi.uio.no>
2008-10-27  5:59   ` Robert Hancock
     [not found] <fa.YTdIGxaBsWvyaUnxBGIS1f8F2BM@ifi.uio.no>
2008-10-26 16:43 ` Robert Hancock
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-10-26 14:42 Paul P
2008-10-26 22:07 ` Davide Libenzi
2008-10-26 22:48   ` Paul P
2008-10-26 23:12     ` Davide Libenzi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=420026.83313.qm@web56306.mail.re3.yahoo.com \
    --to=ppak_98@yahoo.com \
    --cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®