From: Christophe Saout <christophe@saout.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Michal Kwolek <miho@centrum.cz>,
jmorris@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Oopsing cryptoapi (or loop device?) on 2.6.*
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 20:36:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1076873760.21477.8.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040215185331.A8719@infradead.org>
Am So, den 15.02.2004 schrieb Christoph Hellwig um 19:53:
> > > What's holding it back? I'd rather get rid of all the cryptoloop crap
> > > sooner or later.
> >
> > Well, nothing. It's in the dm-unstable tree for some time now. It
> > depends on when Joe plans to submit it. His last words were "in the next
> > couple of months". I don't know what that means exactly.
>
> Is there a technical reason holding it back, e.g. a depency on core DM
> changes? If not please submit it instead of waiting any longer.
The only reason, I guess, is that it depends on this very small
dm-daemon thing:
http://people.sistina.com/~thornber/dm/patches/2.6-unstable/2.6.2/2.6.2-udm1/00016.patch
Some other dm targets in the unstable tree use this too, it's just to
have very simple bottom-half processing in a separate thread with
synchronous start and stop functions.
Especially since dm-crypt was announced in a german linux magazine two
weeks ago people keep asking me when to expect it in the kernel. And to
delay it for some months just because there might be changes to
dm-daemon, which would be almost trivial, is a stupid reason to hold it
back if you ask me. :(
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-15 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-11 15:33 Michal Kwolek
2004-02-11 18:41 ` Jari Ruusu
2004-02-15 2:35 ` Jan Rychter
2004-02-15 14:51 ` Jari Ruusu
2004-02-15 16:38 ` Jari Ruusu
2004-02-16 0:26 ` James Morris
2004-02-18 14:07 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-02-16 12:22 ` Jan Rychter
2004-02-17 14:09 ` Jari Ruusu
2004-02-17 19:14 ` Jan Rychter
2004-02-18 14:06 ` Jari Ruusu
2004-02-18 21:40 ` Jan Rychter
2004-02-19 13:34 ` Jari Ruusu
2004-02-11 22:54 ` bill davidsen
2004-02-15 17:34 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-15 18:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-15 18:42 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-15 18:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-15 19:36 ` Christophe Saout [this message]
2004-02-15 19:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-15 20:24 ` kthread vs. dm-daemon (was: Oopsing cryptoapi (or loop device?) on 2.6.*) Christophe Saout
2004-02-15 22:13 ` kthread vs. dm-daemon Mike Christie
2004-02-16 0:04 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 1:04 ` Mike Christie
2004-02-16 1:29 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 3:02 ` kthread vs. dm-daemon (was: Oopsing cryptoapi (or loop device?) on 2.6.*) Rusty Russell
2004-02-16 13:27 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 16:42 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 13:48 ` Joe Thornber
2004-02-16 1:44 ` dm-crypt using kthread " Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 1:53 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-16 2:07 ` Grzegorz Kulewski
2004-02-16 3:03 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 3:22 ` Grzegorz Kulewski
2004-02-16 4:05 ` dm-crypt using kthread Jeff Garzik
2004-02-16 4:14 ` Grzegorz Kulewski
2004-02-16 10:15 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 9:54 ` dm-crypt using kthread (was: Oopsing cryptoapi (or loop device?) on 2.6.*) Christophe Saout
2004-03-01 22:18 ` Matthias Urlichs
2004-03-01 22:51 ` Christophe Saout
2004-03-01 23:22 ` Matthias Urlichs
2004-02-16 2:58 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 7:28 ` David Wagner
2004-02-16 10:11 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-18 14:15 ` dm-crypt using kthread Bill Davidsen
2004-02-16 2:07 ` dm-crypt using kthread (was: Oopsing cryptoapi (or loop device?) on 2.6.*) Andrew Morton
2004-02-16 2:17 ` dm-crypt using kthread Jeff Garzik
2004-02-16 2:53 ` dm-crypt using kthread (was: Oopsing cryptoapi (or loop device?) on 2.6.*) Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 2:10 ` dm-crypt using kthread Jeff Garzik
2004-02-16 2:40 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 2:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-02-16 3:10 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 13:04 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 19:09 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1076873760.21477.8.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net \
--to=christophe@saout.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jmorris@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miho@centrum.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®