From: Martin Schlemmer <azarah@nosferatu.za.org>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Alistair John Strachan <s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing Lists <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] kbuild updates
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 00:29:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1087856948.9639.33.camel@nosferatu.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040621223344.GD2903@mars.ravnborg.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1904 bytes --]
On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 00:33, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 11:26:54PM +0100, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
> > Sam's point is that unless you ask KBUILD to put the kernel build in a
> > separate directory to its sources (this is not the default
> > behaviour), /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build will still point to the mixture of
> > source and build data, therefore no breakage will occur.
>
> Correct!
>
> > Sam, maybe if there was a way to easily detect whether a kernel had been build
> > with or without a different output directory, it would be easier to have
> > vendors take this change on board. For example, I imagine in the typical case
> > whereby no change in build directory is made, you will have something like
> > this:
> >
> > /lib/modules/2.6.7/build -> /home/alistair/linux-2.6
> > /lib/modules/2.6.7/source -> /home/alistair/linux-2.6
> >
> > Whereas when O is given, it will instead be like this:
> >
> > /lib/modules/2.6.7/build -> /home/alistair/my-dir
> > /lib/modules/2.6.7/source -> /home/alistair/linux-2.6
> >
> > I presume that checking for the existence of /lib/modules/`uname -r`/source
> > will be enough.
> >
> > #
> > # where's the kernel source?
> > #
> >
> > if [ -d /lib/modules/`uname -r`/source ]; then
> > # 2.6.8 and newer
> > KERNDIR="/lib/modules/`uname -r`/source"
> > else
> > # pre 2.6.8 kernels
> > KERNDIR="/lib/modules/`uname -r`/build"
> > fi
>
> Look ok.
>
Yeah, understood, and already seen as the solution.
I guess I just wanted to try and prevent breakage to _existing_
projects, and the need for another hack to try and figure out
how to build for 2.6 (2.6 has been a bumpy ride in external
module building regards =).
But I guess it will not happen, so rather now then much later
when 2.6 is in much wider use ... :-)
Thanks,
--
Martin Schlemmer
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-21 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-20 21:19 Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-20 21:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] kbuil: add deb-pkg target Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-20 21:22 ` [PATCH 0/2] kbuild updates Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-20 21:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] kbuild: Improved external module support Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-20 21:25 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-06-20 21:31 ` Martin Schlemmer
2004-06-20 21:45 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-20 21:38 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-06-21 1:41 ` Petr Vandrovec
2004-06-21 9:01 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-06-21 21:57 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-20 21:30 ` [PATCH 0/2] kbuild updates Martin Schlemmer
2004-06-20 21:42 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-06-20 21:52 ` Martin Schlemmer
2004-06-20 22:26 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2004-06-20 22:39 ` Martin Schlemmer
2004-06-20 23:51 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2004-06-21 22:31 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-21 22:33 ` Martin Schlemmer
2004-06-21 22:50 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2004-06-21 23:03 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-20 22:03 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-20 22:16 ` Martin Schlemmer
2004-06-20 22:26 ` Alistair John Strachan
2004-06-20 22:54 ` Martin Schlemmer
2004-06-21 22:46 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-21 22:33 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-21 22:29 ` Martin Schlemmer [this message]
2004-06-21 22:56 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2004-06-20 22:18 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-20 22:25 ` Martin Schlemmer
2004-06-21 22:48 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-22 5:29 ` Jari Ruusu
2004-06-22 9:20 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2004-06-22 18:23 ` Jari Ruusu
2004-06-22 18:44 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-21 0:29 ` Hannu Savolainen
2004-06-21 1:27 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2004-06-21 6:47 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-06-21 8:02 ` Hannu Savolainen
[not found] <29hJN-3Jl-35@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <29icN-42R-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <29imu-4ad-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <29iwc-4g7-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-06-20 22:36 ` Pascal Schmidt
[not found] <539000871@toto.iv>
2004-06-22 1:39 ` Peter Chubb
2004-06-22 5:20 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-22 8:36 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1087856948.9639.33.camel@nosferatu.lan \
--to=azarah@nosferatu.za.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®