mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: hotplug e1000 failed after 32 times
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:51:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1095641512.24333.8.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <414B7470.4000703@pobox.com>

On Sat, 2004-09-18 at 07:34, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> All this work and code for such an uncommon case??
> 
> First off, any settings which are _indexed_ are almost guaranteed 
> broken.  For reasons as we see here, and others.  Any 
> "setting_foo[board_number]" should be found and eliminated instead.
> 
> Even if you allocate and free board numbers as described, how precisely 
> do you propose to predict which settings belong to which hotplugged 
> board?  Look at the problem, and you realize that the board<->setting 
> association becomes effectively _random_ for any adapter not present at 
> modprobe time.
> 
> The best model is to set these settings via netlink/ethtool after 
> registering the interface, but before bringing it up.
I'm not familiar with the NIC driver, but this problem really is
annoying. The gurus, please consider a solution. It's not an uncommon
case. I believe it's common in a big system with hotplug support. I can
understand why the driver doesn't support more than 32 a card, but one
card with 32 times hotplug failed is a little ugly.

Thanks,
Shaohua


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-09-20  0:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-17  4:53 Li Shaohua
2004-09-17  5:14 ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-17  5:48   ` Li Shaohua
2004-09-17  9:05   ` Li Shaohua
2004-09-17 23:19     ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-17 23:34       ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-19 16:04         ` Jonathan Lundell
2004-09-19 16:50           ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2004-09-20  0:30             ` Jonathan Lundell
2004-09-20  0:51         ` Li Shaohua [this message]
2004-09-20  2:55           ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-20  4:15             ` Chris Leech
2004-09-20  4:35               ` Li Shaohua
2004-09-17  9:06   ` Li Shaohua

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1095641512.24333.8.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com \
    --to=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®