From: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>
To: Chris Leech <chris.leech@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: hotplug e1000 failed after 32 times
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:35:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1095654950.24333.16.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41b516cb0409192115151fe38c@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 12:15, Chris Leech wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 22:55:51 -0400, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> wrote:
> > Li Shaohua wrote:
> > > I'm not familiar with the NIC driver, but this problem really is
> > > annoying. The gurus, please consider a solution. It's not an uncommon
> > > case. I believe it's common in a big system with hotplug support. I can
> > > understand why the driver doesn't support more than 32 a card, but one
> > > card with 32 times hotplug failed is a little ugly.
> >
> > There should be no problem at all with the driver supporting 32 NICs...
> > in fact if it cannot support at least 99 NICs, I would consider that a
> > bug.
>
> I'd like to hear more about what the failure condition actually is,
> see any system messages logged.
>
> The 32 NIC limitation is for configuration via the module parameters,
> but e1000 itself doesn't impose any other limitations on the number of
> NICs. I know of testing situations where 360 e1000 ports were in use
> on a large system. I've run hotplug tests, powering slots on and off
> while passing traffic in a fail-over teaming configuration, for weeks
> without problem. I'll run a hotplug test myself as soon as I get a
> chance, but I don't see any reason why it should be failing.
>
> As for the module parameter limitations, yes only 32 ports can be
> configured that way and the counter doesn't roll back with
> hot-removes. I think we can live with those limitations. Indexed
> parameters make no sense in a hotplug environment, use ethtool.
>
> The module parameters in e1000 work for a large number or users who
> can live with those limitations. That's why they're still in the
> driver. As long as they work, I think they should stay. But I'm not
> in favor of adding more code, or making the existing code more
> complex, to try and remove those limitations. That's why everything
> can be configured through ethtool.
Below is the dmesg I got.
>ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:11:01.0[A] -> GSI 120 (level, low) -> IRQ 58
>e1000: eth1: e1000_probe: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection
>e1000: eth1: e1000_check_options: Warning: no configuration for board
#36
>e1000: eth1: e1000_check_options: Using defaults for all values
but the default value isn't correct, such as the 'speed' is 65535.
I think you are right, I can change the parameter using ethtool. This
way I don't need the driver changes. Thanks.
Thanks,
Shaohua
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-20 4:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-17 4:53 Li Shaohua
2004-09-17 5:14 ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-17 5:48 ` Li Shaohua
2004-09-17 9:05 ` Li Shaohua
2004-09-17 23:19 ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-17 23:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-19 16:04 ` Jonathan Lundell
2004-09-19 16:50 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2004-09-20 0:30 ` Jonathan Lundell
2004-09-20 0:51 ` Li Shaohua
2004-09-20 2:55 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-20 4:15 ` Chris Leech
2004-09-20 4:35 ` Li Shaohua [this message]
2004-09-17 9:06 ` Li Shaohua
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1095654950.24333.16.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com \
--to=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=chris.leech@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®