mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>
To: Chris Leech <chris.leech@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: hotplug e1000 failed after 32 times
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:35:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1095654950.24333.16.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41b516cb0409192115151fe38c@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 12:15, Chris Leech wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 22:55:51 -0400, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> wrote:
> > Li Shaohua wrote:
> > > I'm not familiar with the NIC driver, but this problem really is
> > > annoying. The gurus, please consider a solution. It's not an uncommon
> > > case. I believe it's common in a big system with hotplug support. I can
> > > understand why the driver doesn't support more than 32 a card, but one
> > > card with 32 times hotplug failed is a little ugly.
> > 
> > There should be no problem at all with the driver supporting 32 NICs...
> >   in fact if it cannot support at least 99 NICs, I would consider that a
> > bug.
> 
> I'd like to hear more about what the failure condition actually is,
> see any system messages logged.
> 
> The 32 NIC limitation is for configuration via the module parameters,
> but e1000 itself doesn't impose any other limitations on the number of
> NICs.  I know of testing situations where 360 e1000 ports were in use
> on a large system.  I've run hotplug tests, powering slots on and off
> while passing traffic in a fail-over teaming configuration, for weeks
> without problem.  I'll run a hotplug test myself as soon as I get a
> chance, but I don't see any reason why it should be failing.
> 
> As for the module parameter limitations, yes only 32 ports can be
> configured that way and the counter doesn't roll back with
> hot-removes.  I think we can live with those limitations.  Indexed
> parameters make no sense in a hotplug environment, use ethtool.
> 
> The module parameters in e1000 work for a large number or users who
> can live with those limitations.  That's why they're still in the
> driver.  As long as they work, I think they should stay.  But I'm not
> in favor of adding more code, or making the existing code more
> complex, to try and remove those limitations.  That's why everything
> can be configured through ethtool.
Below is the dmesg I got.
>ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:11:01.0[A] -> GSI 120 (level, low) -> IRQ 58
>e1000: eth1: e1000_probe: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection
>e1000: eth1: e1000_check_options: Warning: no configuration for board
#36
>e1000: eth1: e1000_check_options: Using defaults for all values
but the default value isn't correct, such as the 'speed' is 65535.
I think you are right, I can change the parameter using ethtool. This
way I don't need the driver changes. Thanks.

Thanks,
Shaohua



  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-20  4:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-17  4:53 Li Shaohua
2004-09-17  5:14 ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-17  5:48   ` Li Shaohua
2004-09-17  9:05   ` Li Shaohua
2004-09-17 23:19     ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-17 23:34       ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-19 16:04         ` Jonathan Lundell
2004-09-19 16:50           ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2004-09-20  0:30             ` Jonathan Lundell
2004-09-20  0:51         ` Li Shaohua
2004-09-20  2:55           ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-20  4:15             ` Chris Leech
2004-09-20  4:35               ` Li Shaohua [this message]
2004-09-17  9:06   ` Li Shaohua

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1095654950.24333.16.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com \
    --to=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=chris.leech@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®