From: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: sct@redhat.com, pbadari@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ext3 reservation allow turn off for specifed file
Date: 18 Oct 2004 18:01:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1098147705.8803.1084.camel@w-ming2.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041018164218.70fb08d3.akpm@osdl.org>
On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 16:42, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Allow user shut down reservation-based allocation(using ioctl) on a specific file(e.g. for seeky random write).
>
> Applications currently pass a seeky-access hint into the kernel via
> posix_fadvise(POSIX_FADV_RANDOM). It would be nice to hook into that
> rather than adding an ext3-specific ioctl. Maybe just peeking at
> file->f_ra.ra_pages would suffice.
>
>
Ha, I think I did not make this clear in the description: The patch did
not add a new ext3-specific ioctl. We added two ioctl before for ext3
reservation code to allow user to get and set reservation window size,
so application could set it's desired reservation window size. It allows
the window size to be 0, however the current reservation code just
simply set the window size value to 0, but still try to allocate a size
0 reservation window. We should skip doing reservation-based allocation
at all if the desired window size is 0.
Just thought seeky random write application could use the existing ioctl
to let the kernel know it does not need reservation at all. Isn't that
more straightforward?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-19 1:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-15 13:27 Ext3 -mm reservations code: is this fix really correct? Stephen C. Tweedie
2004-10-15 16:01 ` [Ext2-devel] " mingming cao
2004-10-15 16:40 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2004-10-15 20:29 ` mingming cao
2004-10-15 22:20 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2004-10-15 22:34 ` mingming cao
2004-10-18 22:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] ext3 reservation allow turn off for specifed file Mingming Cao
2004-10-18 23:42 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-19 1:01 ` Mingming Cao [this message]
2004-10-20 17:55 ` Ray Lee
2004-10-25 20:33 ` [Ext2-devel] " Mingming Cao
2004-10-25 23:05 ` Mingming Cao
2004-10-25 23:45 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-26 16:53 ` Mingming Cao
2004-10-26 20:18 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-26 23:01 ` Mingming Cao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1098147705.8803.1084.camel@w-ming2.beaverton.ibm.com \
--to=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®