From: Mete Durlu <meted@linux.ibm.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: frederic@kernel.org, jstultz@google.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, vschneid@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] sched: dynamic: Simplify PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 17:39:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10c3cc66-080b-4a70-979d-90594b06d71d@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260703133358.698078-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>
On 03/07/2026 15:33, Mark Rutland wrote:
> All architectures which currently suppoort PREEMPT_DYNAMIC select
> ARCH_HAS_PREEMPT_LAZY. On architectures which select
> ARCH_HAS_PREEMPT_LAZY, it has not been possible to select the NONE and
> VOLUNTARY preemption models since v7.0 due to commit:
>
> 7dadeaa6e851 ("sched: Further restrict the preemption modes")
>
> Hence in practice PREEMPT_DYNAMIC no longer supports the NONE or
> VOLUNTARY preemption models.
>
> This series makes the de-facto situation official by making
> PREEMPT_DYNAMIC depend on ARCH_HAS_PREEMPT_LAZY, and removing all the
> redundant code.
Hi,
I got some results for s390.
> For x86_64 v7.2-rc1 defconfig built with GCC 10.2.1, this makes the
> bzImage 28K smaller, mostly due to removing NOPs that will never be
> patched to {cond,might}_resched() at runtime:
>
> [mark@lakrids:~/src/linux]% ls -al vmlinux-*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 mark mark 53844952 Jul 3 14:09 vmlinux-after
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 mark mark 53842856 Jul 3 14:09 vmlinux-before
> [mark@lakrids:~/src/linux]% ls -al bzImage-*
> -rw-r--r-- 1 mark mark 14771200 Jul 3 14:09 bzImage-after
> -rw-r--r-- 1 mark mark 14799872 Jul 3 14:08 bzImage-before
>
I applied the series over e4de1b9cb3b5 ("powerpc/dt_cpu_ftrs: Set
CPU_FTR_P11_PVR for Power11 and later processors")
I did git clean -xfd in between compiles and here is how it
looks like for s390;
vmlinux is almost 1M smaller
$ ls -la before/vmlinux
-rwxrwxr-x 1 meted meted 409306880 Jul 30 15:40 before/vmlinux
$ ls -la after/vmlinux
-rwxrwxr-x 1 meted meted 407987680 Jul 30 15:43 after/vmlinux
$ bloat-o-meter before/vmlinux after/vmlinux
add/remove: 67/50 grow/shrink: 731/2058 up/down: 54992/-161849 (-106857)
bzImage is ~32K smaller
$ ls -la before/bzImage
-rwxrwxr-x 1 meted meted 12914688 Jul 30 15:24 before/bzImage
$ ls -la after/bzImage
-rwxrwxr-x 1 meted meted 12881920 Jul 30 15:30 after/bzImage
I also did some sniff tests to see if it causes any
behavior changes, not that its expected, didn't see anything.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-30 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-03 13:33 Mark Rutland
2026-07-03 13:33 ` [PATCH 1/5] sched: dynamic: Make PREEMPT_DYNAMIC depend on ARCH_HAS_PREEMPT_LAZY Mark Rutland
2026-07-06 4:36 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-17 10:59 ` Mark Rutland
2026-07-27 12:37 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-03 13:33 ` [PATCH 2/5] sched: dynamic: Simplify {cond,might}_resched() Mark Rutland
2026-07-06 4:59 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-17 11:03 ` Mark Rutland
2026-07-03 13:33 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched: dynamic: Simplify preempt_schedule{,_notrace}() Mark Rutland
2026-07-06 5:19 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-03 13:33 ` [PATCH 4/5] sched: dynamic: Simplify irqentry_exit_cond_resched() Mark Rutland
2026-07-06 4:42 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-17 11:05 ` Mark Rutland
2026-07-17 13:49 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-17 13:57 ` Mark Rutland
2026-07-27 11:28 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-07-03 13:33 ` [PATCH 5/5] sched: dynamic: Remove HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_{CALL,KEY} Mark Rutland
2026-07-06 4:30 ` [PATCH 0/5] sched: dynamic: Simplify PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-17 11:35 ` Mark Rutland
2026-07-30 15:39 ` Mete Durlu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=10c3cc66-080b-4a70-979d-90594b06d71d@linux.ibm.com \
--to=meted@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®