From: Martin Josefsson <gandalf@wlug.westbo.se>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
"Zhu, Yi" <yi.zhu@intel.com>,
perex@suse.cz, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add pci_save_state() to ALSA
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 17:12:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1100275977.1574.8.camel@tux.rsn.bth.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5hvfcbdv93.wl@alsa2.suse.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1289 bytes --]
On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 14:58, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Fri, 12 Nov 2004 14:45:40 +0100,
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 14:26 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > But pci_save_state() is called again after the driver's suspend
> > > callback is called. So, the final saved state must be anyway same.
> >
> > no that changed recently in the upstream kernel.
> > pci_save_state() is now only called if there is no suspend callback in the driver!
>
> Ah, thanks, that explains why (I referred 2.6.10-rc1).
I realized that I forgot to include som vital information, sorry about
that.
Kernel 2.6.10-rc1-bk21 which has the pci_save_state() change in
pci-driver.c
My driver(s) are intel8x0.c and intel8x0m.c
First I just thought the missing pci_save_state() was a small mistake
and wondered why nobody else had reported the problem, later I found out
that a "generic" pci_save_state() for all pci-devices was removed
recently but I didn't have time to send a mail.
> If so, the patch is almost correct, but pci_save_state() should be put
> after the call of callback.
Great, thanks for fixing the fix.
I havn't had any problems with my broken patch, I'll see if I have the
time to test this one as well this weekend.
--
/Martin
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-12 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-12 13:00 Zhu, Yi
2004-11-12 13:26 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-11-12 13:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-11-12 13:58 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-11-12 16:12 ` Martin Josefsson [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-11-11 20:39 Martin Josefsson
2004-11-12 9:22 ` Takashi Iwai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1100275977.1574.8.camel@tux.rsn.bth.se \
--to=gandalf@wlug.westbo.se \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@suse.cz \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=yi.zhu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®