Re: [PATCH]change 'struct device' -> platform_data to firmware_data

[Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>]

On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 13:06, Greg KH wrote:
> 
> > If we are doing things incorrectly, I am not argueing that our usage
> > has to the way it sits. We could create a new generic serial_device and 
> > flash_device structures and subsystems for these, but that requires 
> > rewriting drivers and board ports; however, we need enough time
> > to work with appropriate subsystem maintainers to do so. My suggestion
> > is to add a new firmware_data field for use by ACPI ATM while we
> > clean things up in ARM world if so required.  Since ACPI is non-existent 
> > on ARM systems, another option is that we keep using the renamed data
> > structure as we have been doing. /me votes for this option
> 
> I like the "just add a firmware_data" field option too.  It doesn't
> break any existing code, and the term "firmware" tells driver authors to
> back away from it and not touch it (and we need to add the proper
> documentation saying this.)
If nobody insists on the intent of platform_data, I'll be glad to add a
new field. It makes things more easy.

Thanks,
Shaohua