From: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@freescale.com>
To: "Li Shaohua" <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: "Greg KH" <greg@kroah.com>, "Deepak Saxena" <dsaxena@plexity.net>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>,
"lkml" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]change 'struct device' -> platform_data to firmware_data
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 00:07:19 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <37B1A29C-6460-11D9-8591-000393DBC2E8@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1105506942.3081.6.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>
Embedded PPC has followed in ARMs footsteps with the use of
platform_data for board specific information to be passed to drivers.
The plan is to grow its use in embedded PPC. It would seem introducing
a new field for ACPI information would be the least painful solution.
Can some clarify what kind of information ACPI needs. I'm asking
because firmware_data does not seem any more clear to me.
Also, we should really probably be a bit more specific in
Documentation/driver-model/device.txt once we decide the meaning of the
fields is, possible giving an example.
- kumar
On Jan 11, 2005, at 11:15 PM, Li Shaohua wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 13:06, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > > If we are doing things incorrectly, I am not argueing that our
> usage
> > > has to the way it sits. We could create a new generic
> serial_device and
> > > flash_device structures and subsystems for these, but that requires
> > > rewriting drivers and board ports; however, we need enough time
> > > to work with appropriate subsystem maintainers to do so. My
> suggestion
> > > is to add a new firmware_data field for use by ACPI ATM while we
> > > clean things up in ARM world if so required. Since ACPI is
> non-existent
> > > on ARM systems, another option is that we keep using the renamed
> data
> > > structure as we have been doing. /me votes for this option
> >
> > I like the "just add a firmware_data" field option too. It doesn't
> > break any existing code, and the term "firmware" tells driver
> authors to
> > back away from it and not touch it (and we need to add the proper
> > documentation saying this.)
> If nobody insists on the intent of platform_data, I'll be glad to add
> a
> new field. It makes things more easy.
>
> Thanks,
> Shaohua
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-12 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-12 2:57 Li Shaohua
2005-01-12 3:54 ` Deepak Saxena
2005-01-12 5:06 ` Greg KH
2005-01-12 5:15 ` Li Shaohua
2005-01-12 6:07 ` Kumar Gala [this message]
2005-01-12 6:37 ` Li Shaohua
2005-01-12 5:02 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=37B1A29C-6460-11D9-8591-000393DBC2E8@freescale.com \
--to=kumar.gala@freescale.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dsaxena@plexity.net \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome