mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rc2-mm2: unneeded cli/sti in fix-preemption-race patch
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:22:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1107177745.21196.333.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41FE319E.E265C599@tv-sign.ru>

On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 16:24 +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > The patch prevents this by leaving interrupts disabled and calling
> > a seperate function preempt_schedule_irq().
> 
> sched-fix-preemption-race-core-i386.patch:
> >
> >	+++ 25-akpm/arch/i386/kernel/entry.S
> >	@@ -189,6 +189,7 @@ ENTRY(resume_userspace)
> >	 
> >	 #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
> >	 ENTRY(resume_kernel)
> >	+	cli
> 
> I think this 'cli' is unneeded. resume_kernel: is used on
> return path from do_IRQ() which leaves interrupts disabled.
> irq_desc->handler->end() should not enable interrupts, yes?
> 
> And we have preempt_stop==cli in ret_from_exception: case,
> before ret_from_intr.

Right. I missed the preempt_stop == cli.

> >	+++ 25-akpm/kernel/sched.c
> >	@@ -2872,6 +2872,48 @@ need_resched:
> >	...
> >	+asmlinkage void __sched preempt_schedule_irq(void)
> >	+{
> >	...
> >	+	local_irq_enable();
> >	+	schedule();
> 
> It is ok to enter schedule() with interrupts disabled, so this
> 'sti' seems to be unneeded too.

Makes sense.

tglx

> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
> 
> --- 2.6.11-rc2-mm2/arch/i386/kernel/entry.S~	Mon Jan 31 14:09:37 2005
> +++ 2.6.11-rc2-mm2/arch/i386/kernel/entry.S	Mon Jan 31 14:55:25 2005
> @@ -189,7 +189,6 @@ ENTRY(resume_userspace)
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
>  ENTRY(resume_kernel)
> -	cli
>  	cmpl $0,TI_preempt_count(%ebp)	# non-zero preempt_count ?
>  	jnz restore_all
>  need_resched:
> --- 2.6.11-rc2-mm2/kernel/sched.c~	Mon Jan 31 14:09:54 2005
> +++ 2.6.11-rc2-mm2/kernel/sched.c	Mon Jan 31 14:57:44 2005
> @@ -2971,7 +2971,6 @@ need_resched:
>  	saved_lock_depth = task->lock_depth;
>  	task->lock_depth = -1;
>  #endif
> -	local_irq_enable();
>  	schedule();
>  	local_irq_disable();
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL


      reply	other threads:[~2005-01-31 13:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-31 13:24 Oleg Nesterov
2005-01-31 13:22 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1107177745.21196.333.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®