mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: [PATCH] rc2-mm2: unneeded cli/sti in fix-preemption-race patch
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:24:46 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41FE319E.E265C599@tv-sign.ru> (raw)

Hello.

Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> The patch prevents this by leaving interrupts disabled and calling
> a seperate function preempt_schedule_irq().

sched-fix-preemption-race-core-i386.patch:
>
>	+++ 25-akpm/arch/i386/kernel/entry.S
>	@@ -189,6 +189,7 @@ ENTRY(resume_userspace)
>	 
>	 #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
>	 ENTRY(resume_kernel)
>	+	cli

I think this 'cli' is unneeded. resume_kernel: is used on
return path from do_IRQ() which leaves interrupts disabled.
irq_desc->handler->end() should not enable interrupts, yes?

And we have preempt_stop==cli in ret_from_exception: case,
before ret_from_intr.

>	+++ 25-akpm/kernel/sched.c
>	@@ -2872,6 +2872,48 @@ need_resched:
>	...
>	+asmlinkage void __sched preempt_schedule_irq(void)
>	+{
>	...
>	+	local_irq_enable();
>	+	schedule();

It is ok to enter schedule() with interrupts disabled, so this
'sti' seems to be unneeded too.

Am I missed something?

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>

--- 2.6.11-rc2-mm2/arch/i386/kernel/entry.S~	Mon Jan 31 14:09:37 2005
+++ 2.6.11-rc2-mm2/arch/i386/kernel/entry.S	Mon Jan 31 14:55:25 2005
@@ -189,7 +189,6 @@ ENTRY(resume_userspace)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
 ENTRY(resume_kernel)
-	cli
 	cmpl $0,TI_preempt_count(%ebp)	# non-zero preempt_count ?
 	jnz restore_all
 need_resched:
--- 2.6.11-rc2-mm2/kernel/sched.c~	Mon Jan 31 14:09:54 2005
+++ 2.6.11-rc2-mm2/kernel/sched.c	Mon Jan 31 14:57:44 2005
@@ -2971,7 +2971,6 @@ need_resched:
 	saved_lock_depth = task->lock_depth;
 	task->lock_depth = -1;
 #endif
-	local_irq_enable();
 	schedule();
 	local_irq_disable();
 #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL

             reply	other threads:[~2005-01-31 12:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-31 13:24 Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2005-01-31 13:22 ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41FE319E.E265C599@tv-sign.ru \
    --to=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®