From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: [PATCH] rc2-mm2: unneeded cli/sti in fix-preemption-race patch
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:24:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41FE319E.E265C599@tv-sign.ru> (raw)
Hello.
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> The patch prevents this by leaving interrupts disabled and calling
> a seperate function preempt_schedule_irq().
sched-fix-preemption-race-core-i386.patch:
>
> +++ 25-akpm/arch/i386/kernel/entry.S
> @@ -189,6 +189,7 @@ ENTRY(resume_userspace)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
> ENTRY(resume_kernel)
> + cli
I think this 'cli' is unneeded. resume_kernel: is used on
return path from do_IRQ() which leaves interrupts disabled.
irq_desc->handler->end() should not enable interrupts, yes?
And we have preempt_stop==cli in ret_from_exception: case,
before ret_from_intr.
> +++ 25-akpm/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -2872,6 +2872,48 @@ need_resched:
> ...
> +asmlinkage void __sched preempt_schedule_irq(void)
> +{
> ...
> + local_irq_enable();
> + schedule();
It is ok to enter schedule() with interrupts disabled, so this
'sti' seems to be unneeded too.
Am I missed something?
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
--- 2.6.11-rc2-mm2/arch/i386/kernel/entry.S~ Mon Jan 31 14:09:37 2005
+++ 2.6.11-rc2-mm2/arch/i386/kernel/entry.S Mon Jan 31 14:55:25 2005
@@ -189,7 +189,6 @@ ENTRY(resume_userspace)
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
ENTRY(resume_kernel)
- cli
cmpl $0,TI_preempt_count(%ebp) # non-zero preempt_count ?
jnz restore_all
need_resched:
--- 2.6.11-rc2-mm2/kernel/sched.c~ Mon Jan 31 14:09:54 2005
+++ 2.6.11-rc2-mm2/kernel/sched.c Mon Jan 31 14:57:44 2005
@@ -2971,7 +2971,6 @@ need_resched:
saved_lock_depth = task->lock_depth;
task->lock_depth = -1;
#endif
- local_irq_enable();
schedule();
local_irq_disable();
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL
next reply other threads:[~2005-01-31 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-31 13:24 Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2005-01-31 13:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41FE319E.E265C599@tv-sign.ru \
--to=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®