mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] enable CONFIG_RTAS_PROC by default
@ 2005-05-06  1:25 Paul Mackerras
  2005-05-06  1:31 ` Arjan van de Ven
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paul Mackerras @ 2005-05-06  1:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm; +Cc: johnrose, linux-kernel, anton

This patch enables CONFIG_RTAS_PROC by default on pSeries.  This will
preserve /proc/ppc64/rtas/rmo_buffer, which is needed by librtas.

This patch should go in 2.6.12.

Signed-off-by: John Rose <johnrose@austin.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
---
diff -puN arch/ppc64/Kconfig~fix_Kconfig arch/ppc64/Kconfig
--- 2_6_linus_3/arch/ppc64/Kconfig~fix_Kconfig	2005-04-12 18:03:45.000000000 -0500
+++ 2_6_linus_3-johnrose/arch/ppc64/Kconfig	2005-04-12 18:03:56.000000000 -0500
@@ -262,6 +262,7 @@ config PPC_RTAS
 config RTAS_PROC
 	bool "Proc interface to RTAS"
 	depends on PPC_RTAS
+	default y
 
 config RTAS_FLASH
 	tristate "Firmware flash interface"

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] enable CONFIG_RTAS_PROC by default
  2005-05-06  1:25 [PATCH] enable CONFIG_RTAS_PROC by default Paul Mackerras
@ 2005-05-06  1:31 ` Arjan van de Ven
  2005-05-06  6:27   ` Paul Mackerras
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Arjan van de Ven @ 2005-05-06  1:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Mackerras; +Cc: akpm, johnrose, linux-kernel, anton

On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 11:25 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> This patch enables CONFIG_RTAS_PROC by default on pSeries.  This will
> preserve /proc/ppc64/rtas/rmo_buffer, which is needed by librtas.


shouldn't this move over to sysfs at some point, to some firmware
directory ?



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] enable CONFIG_RTAS_PROC by default
  2005-05-06  1:31 ` Arjan van de Ven
@ 2005-05-06  6:27   ` Paul Mackerras
  2005-05-06 10:43     ` Arjan van de Ven
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paul Mackerras @ 2005-05-06  6:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arjan van de Ven; +Cc: akpm, johnrose, linux-kernel, anton

Arjan van de Ven writes:

> shouldn't this move over to sysfs at some point, to some firmware
> directory ?

Well, eventually maybe, but there are userspace programs using it, so
we can't remove the /proc interface for a while yet.

Paul.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] enable CONFIG_RTAS_PROC by default
  2005-05-06  6:27   ` Paul Mackerras
@ 2005-05-06 10:43     ` Arjan van de Ven
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Arjan van de Ven @ 2005-05-06 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Mackerras; +Cc: akpm, johnrose, linux-kernel, anton

On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 16:27 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven writes:
> 
> > shouldn't this move over to sysfs at some point, to some firmware
> > directory ?
> 
> Well, eventually maybe, but there are userspace programs using it, so
> we can't remove the /proc interface for a while yet.

sure that's a given, the question is I guess first to start providing a
sysfs equivalent so that apps CAN start using the new thing, before even
thinking about the obsoletion of the old interface. That was more what I
was fishing for ...





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-05-06 10:44 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-05-06  1:25 [PATCH] enable CONFIG_RTAS_PROC by default Paul Mackerras
2005-05-06  1:31 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-05-06  6:27   ` Paul Mackerras
2005-05-06 10:43     ` Arjan van de Ven

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®