From: Bart De Schuymer <bdschuym@pandora.be>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
Bart De Schuymer <bdschuym@telenet.be>,
netfilter-devel@manty.net, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ebtables-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, rankincj@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.12: connection tracking broken?
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 06:23:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1119507800.3387.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050622214920.GA13519@gondor.apana.org.au>
Op do, 23-06-2005 te 07:49 +1000, schreef Herbert Xu:
> Longer term though we should obsolete the ipt_physdev module. The
> rationale there is that this creates a precedence that we can't
> possibly maintain in a consistent way. For example, we don't have
> a target that matches by hardware MAC address. If you wanted to
> do that, you'd hook into the arptables interface rather than deferring
> iptables after the creation of the hardware header.
Iptables also sees purely bridged packets and at least for these packets
the physdev module is useful and harmless. I think removing physdev
alltogether is a bit drastic.
I wonder what flood of messages from angry users the removal of the
physdev functionality for routed packets will stirr.
cheers,
Bart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-23 6:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-18 12:43 Chris Rankin
2005-06-18 14:57 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-06-18 15:14 ` Tobias DiPasquale
2005-06-18 17:16 ` Chris Rankin
2005-06-20 7:19 ` Harald Welte
2005-06-18 19:25 ` Santiago Garcia Mantinan
2005-06-18 22:12 ` Santiago Garcia Mantinan
2005-06-19 13:05 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-20 0:05 ` Herbert Xu
2005-06-20 0:18 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-20 0:50 ` Herbert Xu
2005-06-20 2:45 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-20 6:39 ` Bart De Schuymer
2005-06-20 12:15 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-20 18:46 ` Bart De Schuymer
2005-06-20 18:57 ` Phil Oester
2005-06-20 23:27 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-20 23:22 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-21 7:19 ` Bart De Schuymer
2005-06-21 15:16 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-21 20:46 ` Bart De Schuymer
2005-06-21 21:23 ` Chris Wright
2005-06-21 22:32 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-21 22:34 ` Chris Wright
2005-06-22 0:26 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-22 22:58 ` Chris Rankin
2005-06-23 17:42 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-23 19:49 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-24 8:39 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-28 23:07 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-22 0:45 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-22 21:49 ` Herbert Xu
2005-06-23 0:02 ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2005-06-23 3:31 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-23 6:27 ` [Ebtables-devel] " Bart De Schuymer
2005-06-23 3:26 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-23 3:53 ` Herbert Xu
2005-06-23 6:23 ` Bart De Schuymer [this message]
2005-06-27 8:32 ` Harald Welte
2005-06-27 11:46 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1119507800.3387.18.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=bdschuym@pandora.be \
--cc=bdschuym@telenet.be \
--cc=ebtables-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@manty.net \
--cc=rankincj@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome