From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
Cc: kaber@trash.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, netfilter-devel@manty.net,
ebtables-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, rankincj@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.12: connection tracking broken?
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 17:18:13 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050619.171813.104659699.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1Dk9nK-0001ww-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:05:42 +1000
> Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> wrote:
> >
> > The bridge-netfilter code defers calling of some NF_IP_* hooks to the
> > bridge layer, when the conntrack reference is already gone, so the entry
>
> Why does it defer them at all? Shouldn't the fact that the device is
> bridged be transparent to the IP layer?
The bridge netfilter layer uses netif_rx(skb) at the deepest level in
order to avoid too deep stack usage.
This is also why the NF_HOOK*() macros were semantically changed
a little bit several months ago.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-20 0:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-18 12:43 Chris Rankin
2005-06-18 14:57 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-06-18 15:14 ` Tobias DiPasquale
2005-06-18 17:16 ` Chris Rankin
2005-06-20 7:19 ` Harald Welte
2005-06-18 19:25 ` Santiago Garcia Mantinan
2005-06-18 22:12 ` Santiago Garcia Mantinan
2005-06-19 13:05 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-20 0:05 ` Herbert Xu
2005-06-20 0:18 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2005-06-20 0:50 ` Herbert Xu
2005-06-20 2:45 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-20 6:39 ` Bart De Schuymer
2005-06-20 12:15 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-20 18:46 ` Bart De Schuymer
2005-06-20 18:57 ` Phil Oester
2005-06-20 23:27 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-20 23:22 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-21 7:19 ` Bart De Schuymer
2005-06-21 15:16 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-21 20:46 ` Bart De Schuymer
2005-06-21 21:23 ` Chris Wright
2005-06-21 22:32 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-21 22:34 ` Chris Wright
2005-06-22 0:26 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-22 22:58 ` Chris Rankin
2005-06-23 17:42 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-23 19:49 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-24 8:39 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-28 23:07 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-22 0:45 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-22 21:49 ` Herbert Xu
2005-06-23 0:02 ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2005-06-23 3:31 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-23 6:27 ` [Ebtables-devel] " Bart De Schuymer
2005-06-23 3:26 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-23 3:53 ` Herbert Xu
2005-06-23 6:23 ` Bart De Schuymer
2005-06-27 8:32 ` Harald Welte
2005-06-27 11:46 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050619.171813.104659699.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebtables-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@manty.net \
--cc=rankincj@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®