Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll()

[Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>]

On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 19:22 +0900, Hiro Yoshioka wrote:
> Thanks for your comments.
> 
> On 8/14/05, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 18:16 +0900, Hiro Yoshioka wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The following is a patch to reduce a cache pollution
> > > of __copy_from_user_ll().
> > >
> > > When I run simple iozone benchmark to find a performance bottleneck of
> > > the linux kernel, I found that __copy_from_user_ll() spent CPU cycle
> > > most and it did many cache misses.
> > 
> > 
> > however... you copy something from userspace... aren't you going to USE
> > it? The non-termoral versions actually throw the data out of the
> > cache... so while this part might be nice, you pay BIG elsewhere....
> 
> The oprofile data does not give an evidence that we pay BIG elsewhere.


the problem is that the pay elsewhere is far more spread out, but not
less. At least generally....

I can see the point of a copy_from_user_nocache() or something, for
those cases where we *know* we are not going to use the copied data in
the cpu (but say, only do DMA).
But that should be explicit, not implicit, since the general case will
be that the kernel WILL use the data. And if that's the case your change
is a loss.... (just harder to see because the cost is spread out)