* [RFC] ARM PF_IRQSOFF and PSR_Q_BIT
@ 2005-11-15 20:24 Daniel Walker
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Daniel Walker @ 2005-11-15 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mingo; +Cc: linux-kernel, tglx
In my ARM config PF_IRQSOFF and PSR_Q_BIT are equal. So you end up with
a __RAW_LOCAL_ILLEGAL_MASK that is identical to the PF_IRQSOFF flag. I
get some weird errors in this config, but with PSR_T_BIT everything is
fine .. Any thoughts?
Daniel
Index: linux-2.6.14.2/include/asm-arm/system.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.14.2.orig/include/asm-arm/system.h
+++ linux-2.6.14.2/include/asm-arm/system.h
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ do { \
* bit when thumb mode is disabled. The PSR_s and PSR_x bits are for
* future extensions and definitely unreliable.
*/
-#define __RAW_LOCAL_ILLEGAL_MASK PSR_Q_BIT
+#define __RAW_LOCAL_ILLEGAL_MASK PSR_T_BIT
#include <linux/rt_irq.h>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2005-11-15 20:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-11-15 20:24 [RFC] ARM PF_IRQSOFF and PSR_Q_BIT Daniel Walker
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®