From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: What protection does sysfs_readdir have with SMP/Preemption?
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:33:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1132695202.13395.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
Hi,
I'm developing a custom kernel on top of Ingo's -rt patch. My kernel
makes race conditions in the vanilla kernel show up very well :-)
I just hit a bug, actually a page fault in fs/sysfs/dir.c in
sysfs_readdir:
for (p=q->next; p!= &parent_sd->s_children; p=p->next) {
struct sysfs_dirent *next;
const char * name;
int len;
next = list_entry(p, struct sysfs_dirent,
s_sibling);
if (!next->s_element)
continue;
name = sysfs_get_name(next);
len = strlen(name);
if (next->s_dentry)
ino = next->s_dentry->d_inode->i_ino;
^^^^
This is where I had a bad pointer reference.
else
ino = iunique(sysfs_sb, 2);
if (filldir(dirent, name, len, filp->f_pos, ino,
dt_type(next)) < 0)
return 0;
Looking at this code, I don't see anything protecting the s_dentry. For
example, couldn't the following happen:
sysfs_create_dir is called, which calls create_dir. Now we create a
dentry with no d_inode. In sysfs_make_dirent which calls
sysfs_new_dirent which adds to the parents s_children. Then
sysfs_make_dirent sets s_dentry = dentry (the one that was just made
with no d_inode assigned yet). Then create_dir calls sysfs_create which
finally assigns the d_inode.
So, either there is some hidden protection and my modification to the
kernel has caused this to bug, or we have just been lucky the whole time
in the vanilla kernel.
-- Steve
next reply other threads:[~2005-11-22 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-22 21:33 Steven Rostedt [this message]
2005-11-22 21:39 ` Greg KH
2005-11-23 4:50 ` Maneesh Soni
2005-11-23 8:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-23 12:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-11-23 12:54 ` Maneesh Soni
2005-11-23 12:50 ` Maneesh Soni
2005-11-23 12:52 ` [OOPS] sysfs_hash_and_remove (was Re: What protection ....) Maneesh Soni
2005-11-24 12:26 ` Maneesh Soni
2005-11-24 14:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-26 22:26 ` James Bottomley
2006-02-11 0:33 ` Greg KH
2006-02-11 15:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-02-24 1:04 ` Greg KH
2005-11-23 12:56 ` What protection does sysfs_readdir have with SMP/Preemption? Steven Rostedt
2005-11-23 13:58 ` Maneesh Soni
2005-11-23 14:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-11-23 14:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-11-23 15:24 ` kobject_register needs return value checks (was: What protection does sysfs_readdir have with SMP/Preemption?) Steven Rostedt
2005-11-24 4:16 ` What protection does sysfs_readdir have with SMP/Preemption? Maneesh Soni
2005-11-24 14:32 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1132695202.13395.15.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome